1
edit
Talk:FAQ: Difference between revisions
→Question 11.6 about why qtoctave has been abandoned makes reference to a link which has been removed: new section
Carandraug (talk | contribs) (→Installing octave packages: replying) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Because we have no control over them. If you want, you could make an octave package and host it in your homepage, there's nothing we can do about it. Packages are independent of Octave core. Please don't use the Talk pages of the wiki for placing questions since few follow this. Questions should be made on the mailing list http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/support.html | Because we have no control over them. If you want, you could make an octave package and host it in your homepage, there's nothing we can do about it. Packages are independent of Octave core. Please don't use the Talk pages of the wiki for placing questions since few follow this. Questions should be made on the mailing list http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/support.html | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== Question 11.6 about why qtoctave has been abandoned makes reference to a link which has been removed == | |||
Question 11.6 asks why QtOctave was abandoned instead of being worked on, and notes that the approach taken by QtOctave was bound to fail. | |||
It then states: | |||
''A [http://octave-gsoc2012.blogspot.ie/2012/06/why-not-take-existing-gui.html longer explanation] has already been written as part of GSoC2012.'' | |||
But that link to the longer explanation has been removed. | |||
Surely somebody must have cached the contents somewhere? Or does somebody have an exact phrase from the blog that one could use to search for the article somewhere? | |||