Online Developer Meeting (2024-02-27): Difference between revisions

(→‎Today's topics: Update with notes from meeting)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
* Status of 9.1 Release
* Status of 9.1 Release
** Are there remaining blocker bugs? -- None. In case of issues, a version 9.2 could be released early.
** Are there remaining blocker bugs? -- None. In case of issues, a version 9.2 could be released early.
** Do we issue a second release candidate (RC2)? -- No RC2. jwe will proceed create a release tarball for Octave 9.1 and the Windows installers shortly.
** Do we issue a second release candidate (RC2)? -- No RC2. jwe will proceed to create a release tarball for Octave 9.1 and the Windows installers shortly.
* Common id tag for developer of Octave packages in AppStream Metainfo files?
* Common id tag for developer of Octave packages in AppStream Metainfo files?
** Should they use a different tag from the identifier of core Octave?  See [https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10434 core patch] and [https://github.com/gnu-octave/octave-doctest/pull/286 package change/discussion]
** Should they use a different tag from the identifier of core Octave?  See [https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10434 core patch] and [https://github.com/gnu-octave/octave-doctest/pull/286 package change/discussion]
216

edits