240
edits
(→Today's topics: Update with notes from meeting) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Status of 9.1 Release | * Status of 9.1 Release | ||
** Are there remaining blocker bugs? -- None. In case of issues, a version 9.2 could be released early. | ** Are there remaining blocker bugs? -- None. In case of issues, a version 9.2 could be released early. | ||
** Do we issue a second release candidate (RC2)? -- No RC2. jwe will proceed create a release tarball for Octave 9.1 and the Windows installers shortly. | ** Do we issue a second release candidate (RC2)? -- No RC2. jwe will proceed to create a release tarball for Octave 9.1 and the Windows installers shortly. | ||
* Common id tag for developer of Octave packages in AppStream Metainfo files? | * Common id tag for developer of Octave packages in AppStream Metainfo files? | ||
** Should they use a different tag from the identifier of core Octave? See [https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10434 core patch] and [https://github.com/gnu-octave/octave-doctest/pull/286 package change/discussion] | ** Should they use a different tag from the identifier of core Octave? See [https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10434 core patch] and [https://github.com/gnu-octave/octave-doctest/pull/286 package change/discussion] |
edits