Online Developer Meeting (2021-03-23): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→See also: Announce next meeting.) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* Unify widget for all OSes | * Unify widget for all OSes | ||
* Make jwe's patch a configurable options for testing (nothing to use productively yet) | * Make jwe's patch a configurable options for testing (nothing to use productively yet) | ||
* Need to implement own pager (scroll bar) | * Need to implement own pager (alternatively: scroll bar only) | ||
* Better responsibility delegation between GUI and interpreter | * Better responsibility delegation between GUI and interpreter | ||
** Big matrix output: interpreter | ** Big matrix output: interpreter could ask GUI to print big matrix, GUI could confirm with user, etc. | ||
** Formatting (colors, URLs, etc.) | ** Formatting (colors, URLs, etc.) could be done by the GUI. Interpreter does not need to know about window-width, etc. | ||
===== Backend code improvements ===== | ===== Backend code improvements ===== | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* "Ditch" old UNIX system functions (e.g. popen) | * "Ditch" old UNIX system functions (e.g. popen) | ||
** Move to package? | ** Move to package? | ||
** | ** compose a list of functions that are candidates for removal from core Octave. See: [https://octave.discourse.group/t/moving-posix-system-call-and-library-functions-out-of-core-octave/1027 Moving POSIX system call and library functions out of core Octave] | ||
* performance of symbol lookup | * performance of symbol lookup | ||
** use <code>std::unordered_map</code>, rather than <code>std::map</code> to increase performance of interpreter lookups | ** use <code>std::unordered_map</code>, rather than <code>std::map</code> to increase performance (e.g. of interpreter lookups) | ||
** Potentially implement "import" keyword? That | ** Potentially implement "import" keyword? That would probably slow down symbol lookup some more. | ||
* Replace custom reference counters with implementation using <code>std::shared_ptr</code> | * Replace custom reference counters with implementation using <code>std::shared_ptr</code> | ||
** Some instances are more difficult to replace. jwe will post something about this on the discourse forum. | ** Some instances are more difficult to replace. jwe will post something about this on the discourse forum. | ||
* favor C++ std-library functions over gnulib where possible | * favor C++ std-library functions over gnulib where possible | ||
** Maybe require C++14 or C++17? | ** Maybe require C++14 or C++17? See: [https://octave.discourse.group/t/using-c-17-features/1026 Using C++17 features] | ||
* improve HDF5 integration | * improve HDF5 integration | ||
** Add "wrapper" for libhdf5 functions in Octave's scripting language. | ** Add "wrapper" for libhdf5 functions in Octave's scripting language. | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* Next meeting: | * Next meeting: [[Online Developer Meeting (2021-04-27)]] | ||
* Last meeting: [[Online Developer Meeting (2020-11-10)]] | * Last meeting: [[Online Developer Meeting (2020-11-10)]] | ||
[[Category:2021]] | [[Category:2021]] | ||
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] |
Latest revision as of 02:54, 22 April 2021
Todays topics[edit]
- Meet and greet 5 minutes before meeting (audio testing).
Octave 7[edit]
Previous idea collections for Octave 7[edit]
- Category:Development#Goals_for_upcoming_releases
- Discourse https://octave.discourse.group/t/goals-for-the-next-release/358
How to make Octave 7 visibly special?[edit]
- Implement Matlabs new String-class
- Difficult, but highly demanded.
- Builtin hash-operator
- Distinct feature from Matlab
Improve graphics[edit]
- Use "new" OpenGL code path
- Nice overview by User:Hg200
- Likely to make plotting faster (more efficient methods to move data to graphics card)
- Does not solve "double precision" problem, scaling must happen on Octave side even with new OpenGL code path
- Consult professional OpenGL developer to review code
- General agreement to spend Octave project money on this
Implement Matlabs new input validation[edit]
- jwe can create dummy tree-elements
- Problem if values are evaluated, the "right" action must be done
- Can those validation statements come at arbitrary positions or only at the beginning of the file?
Command Window Widget[edit]
- GUI terminal widget, https://octave.discourse.group/t/new-command-window-widget/501 (jwe's patch!)
- Of special interest for MS Windows users
- Unify widget for all OSes
- Make jwe's patch a configurable options for testing (nothing to use productively yet)
- Need to implement own pager (alternatively: scroll bar only)
- Better responsibility delegation between GUI and interpreter
- Big matrix output: interpreter could ask GUI to print big matrix, GUI could confirm with user, etc.
- Formatting (colors, URLs, etc.) could be done by the GUI. Interpreter does not need to know about window-width, etc.
Backend code improvements[edit]
- "Ditch" old UNIX system functions (e.g. popen)
- Move to package?
- compose a list of functions that are candidates for removal from core Octave. See: Moving POSIX system call and library functions out of core Octave
- performance of symbol lookup
- use
std::unordered_map
, rather thanstd::map
to increase performance (e.g. of interpreter lookups) - Potentially implement "import" keyword? That would probably slow down symbol lookup some more.
- use
- Replace custom reference counters with implementation using
std::shared_ptr
- Some instances are more difficult to replace. jwe will post something about this on the discourse forum.
- favor C++ std-library functions over gnulib where possible
- Maybe require C++14 or C++17? See: Using C++17 features
- improve HDF5 integration
- Add "wrapper" for libhdf5 functions in Octave's scripting language.
- Key to support latest Matlab file formats. Try to implement in the interfaces for that format in .m file functions.
- Some developers very interested in this!
Testing Matlab code[edit]
- jwe will a single Discourse thread to ask for tests in Matlab
- Old Discourse threads many maintainers receive notifications.
Octave online service[edit]
- Similar to Matlab online
- There are already existing services
- In general Jupyter-Notebook based solutions are already highly developed
- Running an own service lacks of manpower and financial resources
Documentation[edit]
- Split Octave manual https://octave.org/doc/latest into
- Function reference, like Octave Forge https://octave.sourceforge.io/docs.php
- Need knowledge how it was created (Kai looks at this again)
- Once succeeded, hosted at https://octave.org/doc/
- Usage manual (like the current one, more detailed, without @docstrings)
- Function reference, like Octave Forge https://octave.sourceforge.io/docs.php
Ideas for next meeting[edit]
- Automatically reschedule the meeting monthly (Kai suggests on Discourse)
- MXE Octave branches and buildbots
- Strategy for transition to string class syntax (incompatible to current double-quoted character vectors in Octave)?
- Allow using more modern C++ dialects (C++17 STL std::filesystem or boost::filesystem)?
See also[edit]
- Next meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2021-04-27)
- Last meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2020-11-10)