Talk:Octave for macOS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dasisdormax (talk | contribs) (→Plotting backend: new section) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hello. The "Homebrew > Simple Installation instructions" section says: <q>The default charting package in Octave is straight qt. However, on the Mac gnuplot often works better.</q>. In which cases is it this way? I actually had plots looking worse and not exporting correctly with gnuplot. | Hello. The "Homebrew > Simple Installation instructions" section says: <q>The default charting package in Octave is straight qt. However, on the Mac gnuplot often works better.</q>. In which cases is it this way? I actually had plots looking worse and not exporting correctly with gnuplot. | ||
:The wiki talk feature is not used widely. Please consult the mailing list "help@octave.org" for questions about macOS and plotting. [[User:Siko1056|Siko1056]] ([[User talk:Siko1056|talk]]) 18:18, 19 December 2019 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 02:18, 20 December 2019
homebrew/science
Please note that Octave is still available through Homebrew. It just has been moved to homebrew/science.
- Thanks. I have fixed it accordingly on the actual page. Please note that pretty much no one pays attention to the discussion pages. Next time you should either fix it yourself on the page or comment on the mailing list. --carandraug 21:24, 1 April 2013 (PDT)
Plotting backend
Hello. The "Homebrew > Simple Installation instructions" section says: The default charting package in Octave is straight qt. However, on the Mac gnuplot often works better.
. In which cases is it this way? I actually had plots looking worse and not exporting correctly with gnuplot.