Talk:FAQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Matlab / Octave Comparison: new section
(→Use of Simulink: new section) |
(→Matlab / Octave Comparison: new section) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
In the section on Simulink it is stated that 'Typically the simulink models lag research and are less flexible, so shouldn't really be used in a research environment'. This implies an extremely narrow definition of 'research' and seems to me to be a quite inappropriate comment. There are many fields of research in which the use of something like Simulink is very sensible. I think it should be removed or revised, but as an outsider I don't want to do so without discussion. | In the section on Simulink it is stated that 'Typically the simulink models lag research and are less flexible, so shouldn't really be used in a research environment'. This implies an extremely narrow definition of 'research' and seems to me to be a quite inappropriate comment. There are many fields of research in which the use of something like Simulink is very sensible. I think it should be removed or revised, but as an outsider I don't want to do so without discussion. | ||
== Matlab / Octave Comparison == | |||
This is the year 2015. The comparison between matlab and Octave in this wiki is from 2010. '''5 years ago''' Can somebody with access to both programs provide an '''up to date''' comparison. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/77.99.46.180|77.99.46.180]] 17:11, 9 February 2015 (PST) | |||