387
edits
FAQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Why are the developers planning to replace Gnuplot with an OpenGL backend?
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
==Why are the developers planning to replace Gnuplot with an OpenGL backend?== | ==Why are the developers planning to replace Gnuplot with an OpenGL backend?== | ||
The development of Octave is committed to being both compatible with Matlab and adding additional features. Toward those ends, the development community has chosen to introduce a native OpenGL backend that supports Matlab handle graphics and its uicontrols. The introduction of the experimental fltk graphics toolkit is the first product of this effort. As of the 3.6.N series, the fltk toolkit is approximately as advanced as is the Gnuplot toolkit. It is not yet decided if the fltk toolkit is to become the default backend, or if another OpenGL implementation will replace Gnuplot as the default backend | The development of Octave is committed to being both compatible with Matlab and adding additional features. Toward those ends, the development community has chosen to introduce a native OpenGL backend that supports Matlab handle graphics and its uicontrols. The introduction of the experimental fltk graphics toolkit is the first product of this effort. As of the 3.6.N series, the fltk toolkit is approximately as advanced as is the Gnuplot toolkit. It is not yet decided if the fltk toolkit is to become the default backend, or if another OpenGL implementation will replace Gnuplot as the default backend. A Qt OpenGL toolkit is also [https://github.com/goffioul/QtHandles under development]. | ||
There are no plans to | There are no plans to remove the gnuplot backend. While a better backend may some day become the new default plotter, the gnuplot backend will still be available for the foreseeable future. | ||
==How can I cite Octave?== | ==How can I cite Octave?== | ||