47
edits
User:LYH: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→GSoC 2013 - Application
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
:* '''If yes, what task did you choose? Please describe what part of it you especially want to focus on if you can already provide this information.''' | :* '''If yes, what task did you choose? Please describe what part of it you especially want to focus on if you can already provide this information.''' | ||
::I chosse “Improveing JIT compiling” project, focusing on “Enhance JITC functionality” and “Migrate from LLVM JIT to LLVM MCJIT”. Current JITC lacks some feature. In addition disablility of built-in function linking, JITC cannot work with matrice data type but only scalar type. I want to concentrate on expanding JITC to handle this non-trivial but fundamental case. Second, I would begin to migrate from LLVM JIT to LLVM MCJIT. JITC use JIT now, however LLVM community has no longer maintain JIT and move on MCJIT. I think we could move on MCJIT (and still support JIT). This is really important if we want to get the benefit from LLVM subsequently. | |||
::When all essential case has been added, I would try implement some JIT related optimization into JITC (like trace/method-based JIT). | |||
::According to what I had discussed in previous questions, I am really very interested in developing new GUI tools for working with graphics and assist in finalizing the GUI Octave. | ::According to what I had discussed in previous questions, I am really very interested in developing new GUI tools for working with graphics and assist in finalizing the GUI Octave. | ||