1,174
edits
Online Developer Meeting (2025-03-25): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Tweak text
m (Tweak text) |
m (Tweak text) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
** Is Octave's own internal api tag required anymore? | ** Is Octave's own internal api tag required anymore? | ||
** Does <code>liboctmex</code> need to check version anymore? Or is this already handled by <code>oct-shlib.cc</code> <code>OCTAVE_API_VERSION</code> is only used to check version match when loading <code>.oct</code> files. This may only matter on systems that don't have proper library versioning. But even on those systems, we might be able to perform a check based on shared library versions stored in the <code>.oct</code> file instead of using <code>OCTAVE_API_VERSION</code>. | ** Does <code>liboctmex</code> need to check version anymore? Or is this already handled by <code>oct-shlib.cc</code> <code>OCTAVE_API_VERSION</code> is only used to check version match when loading <code>.oct</code> files. This may only matter on systems that don't have proper library versioning. But even on those systems, we might be able to perform a check based on shared library versions stored in the <code>.oct</code> file instead of using <code>OCTAVE_API_VERSION</code>. | ||
* Sloppy Numfocus website? (https://numfocus.org/project/gnu-octave). Clicking on Octave logo goes to galaxyproject.org, not Octave web site. '''[1. Top logo should point to octave.org, 2. Contribute code logo should point to Get Involved page, 3. Bottom logo should point to website, not Mercurial archive]''' [jwe wrote e-mail, but website is still not updated as of 2025/03/23; reply received on 2025/03/19 promising an update "as quickly as possible"] | * Sloppy Numfocus website? (https://numfocus.org/project/gnu-octave). Clicking on Octave logo goes to galaxyproject.org, not Octave web site. '''[1. Top logo should point to octave.org, 2. Contribute code logo should point to Get Involved page, 3. Bottom logo should point to website, not Mercurial archive]''' [jwe wrote e-mail, but website is still not updated as of 2025/03/23; reply received on 2025/03/19 promising an update "as quickly as possible". '''jwe will ping them again'''] | ||
* Discussion on continued use of Savannah Bug Tracker | * Discussion on continued use of Savannah Bug Tracker | ||
** Latest motivation to find something better is the inability to search for bug reports for old releases. | ** Latest motivation to find something better is the inability to search for bug reports for old releases. | ||