Online Developer Meeting (2022-11-22): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
+followup
(+followup)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
** '''Consensus: mmuetzel preferred not being listed. Rik was OK either way. Other signatories (jwe, siko1056, nrjank, arungiridhar) converged.'''
** '''Consensus: mmuetzel preferred not being listed. Rik was OK either way. Other signatories (jwe, siko1056, nrjank, arungiridhar) converged.'''
** '''mmuetzel and colin wanted to know other GNU projects that have joined NumFOCUS and how they managed their transition. Arun has reached out to GNU Radio.'''
** '''mmuetzel and colin wanted to know other GNU projects that have joined NumFOCUS and how they managed their transition. Arun has reached out to GNU Radio.'''
** '''(Follow-up, 2022-12-06: GNU Radio's response strongly encouraged getting classified as a fiscally supported member of NumFOCUS ASAP and redirecting any current funding flows to the new NumFOCUS account. Any funds in the FSF fund gathered for Octave can be requested to be transferred afterwards. We should also let FSF know our intention to become a NumFOCUS project. We should also find out from FSF how much money we have in the Octave account, but that is not a prerequisite for joining NumFOCUS.)'''


* Octave infrastructure - FOSSHost abandonment
* Octave infrastructure - FOSSHost abandonment
179

edits

Navigation menu