179
edits
ArunGiridhar (talk | contribs) (→Today's topics: adding notes) |
ArunGiridhar (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** '''jwe prefers incorporating that into the default branch of Octave as soon as practical, and let it remain off by default unless the user wants to enable it with a configure switch or a runtime switch''' | ** '''jwe prefers incorporating that into the default branch of Octave as soon as practical, and let it remain off by default unless the user wants to enable it with a configure switch or a runtime switch''' | ||
** '''This would be formed into an API for a generic VM approach to Octave that can be used for other VMs such as the Jitter one, etc''' | ** '''This would be formed into an API for a generic VM approach to Octave that can be used for other VMs such as the Jitter one, etc''' | ||
* Release process for Octave 7.2: | |||
** About 10 (actual) changes since the last release candidate (about 6 weeks ago). Should we make a second release candidate? | |||
** Not much feedback for the first release candidate. Should we skip making release candidates entirely and directly make releases? Should we announce them more prominently (e.g., on the web page)? | |||
* Classdef | |||
** '''Technical discussion happened on things specific to classdefs''' | |||
* Octave packages progress update | * Octave packages progress update | ||
* Managing diversity of libraries (libm, libc etc) | * Managing diversity of libraries (libm, libc etc) | ||
** See [https://octave.discourse.group/t/point-of-openlibm-project-or-if-even-julia-wants-to-shift-away-from-openlibm-do-we-want-to-use-it/2980/ background] | ** See [https://octave.discourse.group/t/point-of-openlibm-project-or-if-even-julia-wants-to-shift-away-from-openlibm-do-we-want-to-use-it/2980/ background] | ||
* Octave 7.3 and 8 timeline? | * Octave 7.3 and 8 timeline? | ||
edits