Summer of Code - Getting Started: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Symbolic package: More realistic project
(→‎Improve TIFF image support: Shrink project size)
(→‎Symbolic package: More realistic project)
Line 89: Line 89:
== Symbolic package ==
== Symbolic package ==


The [[Symbolic package]] provides symbolic computing and other [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_algebra_system computer algebra system] tools.  The main component of Symbolic is a pure m-file class "@sym" which uses the Python package [https://www.sympy.org SymPy] to do (most of) the actual computations.  The package aims to expose the full functionality of SymPy while also providing a high level of compatibility with the Matlab Symbolic Math Toolbox.  The Symbolic package requires communication between Octave and Python.  In 2016 another GSoC project successfully re-implemented this communication using the new [[Pythonic|Pythonic package]].
The [[Symbolic package]] provides symbolic computing and other [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_algebra_system computer algebra system] tools.  The main component of Symbolic is a pure m-file class "@sym" which uses the Python package [https://www.sympy.org SymPy] to do (most of) the actual computations.  The package aims to expose much of the functionality of SymPy while also providing a high level of compatibility with the Matlab Symbolic Math Toolbox.  The Symbolic package requires communication between Octave and Python.  In 2016 another GSoC project successfully re-implemented this communication using the new [[Pythonic|Pythonic package]].


This project proposes to go further: instead of using Pythonic only for the communication layer, we'll use it throughout the Symbolic project.  For example, we might make "@sym" a subclass of "@pyobject".  We also could stop using the "python_cmd" interface and use Pythonic directly from methods.  The main goal was already mentioned: to expose the ''full functionality'' of SymPy.  For example, we would allow OO-style method calls such as <code>f.diff(x)</code> instead of <code>diff(f, x)</code>.
This project proposes to take this work further while also improving the long-term viability of the Symbolic package.  Some goals include:
1. instead of using Pythonic only for the communication layer, we'll use it throughout the Symbolic project.  For example, we might make "@sym" a subclass of "@pyobject".  We also could stop using the "pycall_sympy__" interface and use Pythonic directly from methods.  Note: there are open questions about how to do this during a transition time when we still support other IPC mechanisms.
2. exposing more functionality of SymPy with ''less glue'' in between.  For example, we could allow OO-style method calls such as <code>f.diff(x)</code> as well as <code>diff(f, x)</code>.
3. Improvements to the Pythonic package and its long-term maintenance.
4. fixing up Symbolic to work with the latest releases of SymPy and Octave.  The project has lagged for a few years and needs some efforts to port to recent and upcoming changes in SymPy code.
5. making Symbolic easier to maintain.  The project currently has a low ''bus factor'': improving the CI, making regular releases easier, improving other aspects of maintenance and making the project more welcoming to newcomers.
 
Working on this project involves and interesting and challenging mix of m-file code, Python code, and in the case of Pythonic, perhaps some lower-level C code.


* '''Project size''' [[#Project sizes | [?]]] and '''Difficulty'''
* '''Project size''' [[#Project sizes | [?]]] and '''Difficulty'''
99

edits

Navigation menu