Reviewing Octave Forge packages: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reviewing Octave Forge packages (edit)

Revision as of 03:25, 1 October 2020

360 bytes removed ,  1 October 2020
→‎Checklist: Review list
(Update Checklist fill out procedure.)
(→‎Checklist: Review list)
Line 13: Line 13:


<pre>
<pre>
# Repository
# Repository / Metadata


- [ ] maintainer has specified a corresponding revision commit/changeset
- [ ] release commit/changeset specified and present in repository
- [ ] checkout code from Sourceforge, commit/changeset is present
- [ ] `generate_package_html` / `make html` works without errors and warnings
- [ ] generated HTML documentation looks sane


# Compile and Install
# pkg-tool runs without errors or warnings
 
- [ ] release candidate installs on latest stable Octave release
- [ ] no compiler errors or warnings
- [ ] ran tests using <code>runtests /path/to/pkg</code> (use <code>oruntests</code> instead in Octave 6.0.0 or later)
- [ ] ran all tests, including those in src (how??)
- [ ] ran doctest on all functions (optional)
- [ ] ran generate_package_html (if Makefile present try <code> make html </code>)
- [ ] no makeinfo errors and warnings during HTML build
- [ ] unpacked and spot-checked the generated HTML documentation
 
# `pkg`-tool runs without errors or warnings


- [ ] `pkg install  foo`
- [ ] `pkg load      foo`
- [ ] `pkg load      foo`
- [ ] `pkg unload    foo`
- [ ] `pkg unload    foo`
- [ ] `pkg uninstall foo`
- [ ] `pkg uninstall foo`
- [ ] Above steps were run on Octave and OS versions:
- Above steps were run on Octave and OS versions:
      -  ________
  -  ________
      -  ________
  -  ________
 
# Package tests
 
- [ ] ran tests (`runtests /path/to/pkg` or `oruntests`)
- [ ] ran `doctest` on all functions


# Package files in release candidate tarball
# Package files in release candidate tarball
Retrieved from "https://wiki.octave.org/Special:MobileDiff/13387"

Navigation menu