Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  1 June
m
→‎Should I favor the MEX interface to avoid the GPL?: Corrected a spelling error in the headline
'''No.''' Instead of asking us to change the licensing terms for Octave, we recommend that you release your program under terms that are compatible with the GPL, this way the free software community can be benefited from your work the same as you were/have benefited from the work of all the people who have contributed to Octave.
==Should I favor favour the MEX interface to avoid the GPL?==
'''No.''' The original reason for implementing the [https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Mex_002dFiles.html MEX interface] for Octave was to allow Octave to run free software that uses MEX files (the particular goal was to run [https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history#sundialsTB sundialsTB] in Octave). The intent was to liberate that software from Matlab and increase the amount of free softwares available to Octave users & not to enable people to write proprietary code for Octave. For the good of the community, we strongly encourage users of Octave to release the code they write for Octave under terms that are compatible with the [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html GPL].

Navigation menu