32
edits
Talk:Octave and separate toolchain: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(Reinventing the wheel?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't [[MXE]] Octave doing the job of compiling the whole toolchain, even if there exists one on a Linux distribution? At least this was the point I found annoying and decided to create a more "lightweight" solution especially for the 64 bit indexing. https://github.com/siko1056/GNU-Octave-enable-64 | Isn't [[MXE]] Octave doing the job of compiling the whole toolchain, even if there exists one on a Linux distribution? At least this was the point I found annoying and decided to create a more "lightweight" solution especially for the 64 bit indexing. https://github.com/siko1056/GNU-Octave-enable-64 | ||
- The page needs transposition to current versions, but nothing changed much. | |||
This page shows how to build any gcc toolchain, with perfect control of any details, which is not covered by mxe IIURC. | |||
Agreed that mxe looks simpler and should be recommended. [Ederag] | |||