OctConf 2012: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Octave distribution
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
Making Octave updates trivial for maintenance in large scale computing infrastructures. Octave binary for OS X. What should be included in an all-in-one installer? What versions of OS-X can/should be "supported"? Octave binary for Windows. What should be included in an all-in-one installer? What versions of Windows can/should be "supported". | Making Octave updates trivial for maintenance in large scale computing infrastructures. Octave binary for OS X. What should be included in an all-in-one installer? What versions of OS-X can/should be "supported"? Octave binary for Windows. What should be included in an all-in-one installer? What versions of Windows can/should be "supported". | ||
We have a good relationship with Debian and Fedora maintainers. Not so much other GNU/Linux distriubtions. Can we improve our relationships with others? How? | |||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||