Editing User:Castarco

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 19: Line 19:


=== The biggest project ===
=== The biggest project ===
The biggest project I worked on is '''Infantium''', a spanish startup aiming to apply machine learning techniques to children's learning process modelling in order to improve and optimize it, helping them to learn more and faster. The idea was to analyse their gaming sessions (with educative games) in order to compute cognitive indicators (numerical coefficients measuring their capabilities, designed to associate "bigger" to "better") and trying to maximize them. The "problem" isn't one single problem, but many difficult interrelated problems (designing models, guessing models parameters, validating the models, maximizing children's coefficients, dealing with "inflation" and "deflation" problems associated to children scores, designing experiments, making temporal series predictions...).  
The biggest project I worked on is '''Infantium''', a spanish startup aiming to apply machine learning techniques to children's learning process modelling in order to improve and optimize it, helping them to learn more and faster. The idea was to analyse their gaming sessions (with educative games) in order to compute cognitive indicators (numerical coefficients, designed to associate "bigger" to "better") and trying to maximize them. The "problem" isn't one single problem, but many difficult interrelated problems (designing models, guessing models parameters, validating the models, maximizing children's coefficients, dealing with "inflation" and "deflation" problems associated to children scores, designing experiments, making temporal series predictions...).  


This is an interesting project and idea, but we didn't work in a rational way. Sadly, we hadn't psychologists nor neurologists in our team , and our bosses denied the needed resources to experiment and obtain information to validate or refute the models, and to adjust their parameters. They expected magic from their workers: parameterless perfect models (without having experts in the field), or guessing the parameters from divine inspiration. We were three non-expert workers, and many serious companies have more (and more skilled) workers for much more humble projects.
This is an interesting project and idea, but we didn't work in a rational way. Sadly, we hadn't psychologists nor neurologists in our team , and our bosses denied the needed resources to experiment and obtain information to validate or refute the models, and to adjust their parameters. They expected magic from their workers: parameterless perfect models (without having experts in the field), or guessing the parameters from divine inspiration. We were three non-expert workers, and many serious companies have more (and more skilled) workers for much more humble projects.
Line 52: Line 52:


== S: Self-assessment ==
== S: Self-assessment ==
* About useful criticism: I think criticism is useful when it's done with respect, without insults, without condescension, and when it's done in a constructive way (all together). Put it simple, if a critic is done to help me understand that what I've done could be done in a better way, and an alternative approach is sketched or pointed, then I'll learn something. But if all I receive is something like "your work is crap", then I'll leave the project and start looking for projects with nicer people.  
* Please describe how useful criticism looks from your point of view as committing student.
 
* How autonomous are you when developing? ''If you answer both subquestions with "Yes, definitely", we are a tad confused. ;-)''
* How autonomous are you when developing? I'm relatively independent when I develop, but evidently I'm more independent when I'm familiar with the code base. In any case, when I suspect a change can be polemic or can affect my partners work, then I think it's good to discuss it and looking for a good consensus solution.
** Do you like to discuss changes intensively and not start coding until you know what you want to do?
* I think proof of concepts are a very good idea, and I should use this "tool" more. I have to admit that I don't usually do proof of concepts. I don't mind "throwing away code", I'm used to it, even without doing proofs of concepts. If I don't do proofs of concepts is mainly because: the company doesn't want to spend money on "unproductive" work, or because I work for myself without having to agree with anybody.
** Do you like to code a proof of concept to 'see how it turns out', modifying that and taking the risk of having work thrown away if it doesn't match what the project or original proponent had in mind?


== Y: Your task ==
== Y: Your task ==
* Did you select a task from our list of proposals and ideas? Yes, from [[http://wiki.octave.org/GSoC_Project_Ideas#Suggested_projects]], Infrastructure section: '''Octave Package management''' ( [[http://wiki.octave.org/OEP:pkg]] ).
* Did you select a task from our list of proposals and ideas?
 
** If yes, what task did you choose? Please describe what part of it you especially want to focus on if you can already provide this information. ''Please also wiki-link the page for your elaborated proposal here.''
** If yes, what task did you choose? Please describe what part of it you especially want to focus on if you can already provide this information. ''Please also wiki-link the page for your elaborated proposal here.''
** If you apply for a task you have added yourself instead, please describe this task, its scope and people you already talked to concerning it. What field of tasks did you miss on the list?
** If you apply for a task you have added yourself instead, please describe this task, its scope and people you already talked to concerning it. What field of tasks did you miss on the list?
* Please provide a rough estimated timeline for your work on the task. ''This should include the GSoC midterms and personal commitments like exams or vacation ("non-coding time"). Optionally include two or three milestones you expect.''
* Please provide a rough estimated timeline for your work on the task. ''This should include the GSoC midterms and personal commitments like exams or vacation ("non-coding time"). Optionally include two or three milestones you expect.''
[[Category: Summer of Code]]
[[Category: Summer of Code]]
Please note that all contributions to Octave may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Octave:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)