Talk:Short projects: Difference between revisions

From Octave
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(→‎c2d suggestion: new section)
Line 2: Line 2:


--[[User:Alcedine|Alcedine]] 10:43, 4 March 2014 (PST)
--[[User:Alcedine|Alcedine]] 10:43, 4 March 2014 (PST)
== c2d suggestion ==
(control toolbox),  this would be very simple to implement as a new choice (now basic choices are bilinear, ZOH I think).
Al-Alaoui has introduced a variant of the bilinear/Tustin as follows:
:<math>s = \frac{2(z-1)}{T(z''(1+q)''+(1''-q''))}</math>\where 0<=q=<1
The variant just has the additional part in italics.
It would be useful to have an additional call option as follows.
Now it's c2d(sys,T,opt)  eg  Hz=c2d(sys,0.5,'bi')
new call would be Hz=c2d(sys,0.5,'alal',0.75) where the last parameter is the "q" seen above.  Or could be 'bi2' or whatever.
Thanks ...

Revision as of 15:02, 8 February 2015

For the bugs, maybe not so much, since they do contain a link to the tracker, which is where the patch would be submitted anyway. For the missing functions, it would probably be a good idea.

--Alcedine 10:43, 4 March 2014 (PST)

c2d suggestion

(control toolbox), this would be very simple to implement as a new choice (now basic choices are bilinear, ZOH I think). Al-Alaoui has introduced a variant of the bilinear/Tustin as follows:

\where 0<=q=<1

The variant just has the additional part in italics. It would be useful to have an additional call option as follows. Now it's c2d(sys,T,opt) eg Hz=c2d(sys,0.5,'bi') new call would be Hz=c2d(sys,0.5,'alal',0.75) where the last parameter is the "q" seen above. Or could be 'bi2' or whatever. Thanks ...