User talk:Genuinelucifer: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 128: Line 128:




At this moment building of boost-python with 64 bit tool chain fails at final link stage. Using 32 bit octave 4.1.0+ for windows build of boost_python was successful.
At this moment building of boost-python with 64 bit tool chain fails at final link stage. So far octave-4.1.0+ 64 bit was used. From this point we shifted to using 32 bit octave. Using 32 bit octave 4.1.0+ for windows build of boost_python was successful.
So far octave-4.1.0+ 32 bit has been used.


 
==== Build Pytave  ====
==== Build Pytave  ====


Line 201: Line 198:
=== Conclusion ===
=== Conclusion ===


To quote Tatsuro ''A lot of _imp__ symbols errors are detected because no _imp__(symbol)s exist in object files. While object files libboost_python for threading-multi have _imp__(symbol)s in their object files. Boost does not show full compiling states. Therefore I do not know what libboost is to do.''
With some efforts, build Pytave on windows has not been completed yet.
Here list of unsolved issue including boost-python are listed
 
# libboost_python cannot be build be build on 64 bit environments
# path separator handling issue in libtool (windows standard path separator \ (back slash) is ignored.
# make fails at building shared library
 
For 3, to quote Tatsuro ''A lot of _imp__ symbols errors are detected because no _imp__(symbol)s exist in object files. While object files libboost_python for threading-multi have _imp__(symbol)s in their object files. Boost does not show full compiling states. Therefore I do not know what libboost is to do.''


I too have googled extensively but haven't gotten to any solution for this problem.
I too have googled extensively but haven't gotten to any solution for this problem.

Navigation menu