LYH

Joined 29 April 2013
801 bytes added ,  3 May 2013
Line 101: Line 101:


:* '''If yes, what task did you choose? Please describe what part of it you especially want to focus on if you can already provide this information.'''
:* '''If yes, what task did you choose? Please describe what part of it you especially want to focus on if you can already provide this information.'''
::I chosse “Improveing JIT compiling” project, focusing on “Enhance JITC functionality” and “Migrate from LLVM JIT to LLVM MCJIT”. Current JITC lacks some feature. In addition disablility of built-in function linking, JITC cannot work with matrice data type but only scalar type. I want to concentrate on expanding JITC to handle this non-trivial but fundamental case. Second, I would begin to migrate from LLVM JIT to LLVM MCJIT. JITC use JIT now, however LLVM community has no longer maintain JIT and move on MCJIT. I think we could move on MCJIT (and still support JIT). This is really important if we want to get the benefit from LLVM subsequently.
::When all essential case has been added, I would try implement some JIT related optimization into JITC (like trace/method-based JIT).
::According to what I had discussed in previous questions, I am really very interested in developing new GUI tools for working with graphics and assist in finalizing the GUI Octave.
::According to what I had discussed in previous questions, I am really very interested in developing new GUI tools for working with graphics and assist in finalizing the GUI Octave.


47

edits