Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| This page shows how to build any gcc toolchain, with perfect control of any details, which is not covered by mxe IIURC. | | This page shows how to build any gcc toolchain, with perfect control of any details, which is not covered by mxe IIURC. |
| Agreed that mxe looks simpler and should be recommended. [Ederag] | | Agreed that mxe looks simpler and should be recommended. [Ederag] |
|
| |
| :The talk function of this wiki is hardly used. Consider using the Octave mailing-lists if you want more feedback than only by me ;-) Sure, I just marked the page as outdated, that no one gets the idea it actually builds a state-of-the art Octave. If you want to maintain this page, feel free to do so and remove the badge of the top of the page. [[User:Siko1056|Siko1056]] ([[User talk:Siko1056|talk]]) 07:04, 20 January 2020 (PST)
| |
|
| |
| :: Thanks, I fully agree with keeping the warning. The wording has just been [[Special:Diff/12571|edited]]. [[User:Ederag|Ederag]] ([[User talk:Ederag|talk]]) 07:29, 20 January 2020 (PST)
| |