Status of bugs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
844 bytes removed ,  3 May 2016
(17 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
!Bug ID !! Status !! Suggested action !! Type !! comments
!Bug ID !! Status !! Suggested action !! Type !! comments
|-
|-
|{{bug|31626}} || Patch || Apply patch || X || ''Can't run odetest.m, "error: handles to nested functions are not yet supported''
|{{bug|31626}} || Patch ||   || X || ''Can't run odetest.m, "error: handles to nested functions are not yet supported''
''error: called from''
''error: called from''
  ''odetest at line 18 column 20''
  ''odetest at line 18 column 20''
Line 17: Line 17:
|-
|-
|{{bug|32008}} || Patch || N/C || M || Needs more documentation so a committer can understand it thoroughly
|{{bug|32008}} || Patch || N/C || M || Needs more documentation so a committer can understand it thoroughly
|-
|{{bug|32088}} || Patch || "In progress" || || Existing patch does not meet requirements
|-
|-
<!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install
<!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install
|-  -->
|-  -->
|{{bug|32885}} || Patch || Review latest patch || E || Patch is simple..
|<strike> {{bug|33523}} </strike> || Ready for test || Review patch || M || ''Seems to work fine with patch''
|-
|{{bug|32924}} || Patch || "Postponed" || E || Jordi was going to fix this in 2011.  Should re-allocated to "None"?
|-
|{{bug|33503}} || Patch || "closed" || -- || This is just a matter of roundoff
|-
|-
|{{bug|33523}} || Confirmed || Review patch || M || ''Seems to work fine with patch''
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X || Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed".  Which version failed? The latest patch seems to work for me -- Lachlan
|-
Newest patch works fine (philip)
|{{bug|34363}} || Patch || "None" || P || All supplied patches have been applied
|-
|{{bug|34624}} || Patch || "Duplicate"? || O || Duplicate of #44095?
|-
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X || Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed"
|-
|-
|{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all.  No progress for two years.
|{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all.  No progress for two years.
|-
| <strike> {{bug|41315}} </strike> || <strike> Closed </strike> || <strike> "Fixed" </strike> || || <strike> Fixed in 4.0.1 </strike>
|-
|-
|{{bug|41512}} || Open || Review patch || M ||
|{{bug|41512}} || Open || Review patch || M ||
|-
|-
|{{bug|42705}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|{{bug|42705}} || Patch || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|-
|{{bug|42825}} || Confirmed || Review patch || E || ''The example in OP works after this patch''
|-
|{{bug|42850}} || Confirmed || Review patch || C ||''The example in OP works after this patch''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43038}} || Needs Info || Mark as duplicate of {{bug|33523}} || M ||
|<strike> {{bug|42850}} </strike> || Fixed || Review patch || C ||''The example in OP works after this patch''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43511}} || None || Review patch || E ||''Fixes the bug''
|<strike> {{bug|43511}} </strike> || Patch || Review patch || E ||''Fixes the bug''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43925}} || None || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}} ''Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet''
|{{bug|43925}} || Ready for test || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}} ''Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet''
|-
|-
|{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}.
|{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}.
Line 59: Line 42:
|-
|-
|{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|-
|{{bug|46933}} || Confirmed || Review patch || C || The patch solves the crash problem. Please review
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 70: Line 51:
|{{bug|33411}} || No || Patch supplied ''See comment in bug report''
|{{bug|33411}} || No || Patch supplied ''See comment in bug report''
|-
|-
|{{bug|34804}} || No || Patch supplied ''Patch works fine''
|<strike> {{bug|34804}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied ''Patch works fine''
|-
|-
|{{bug|36576}} || Yes ||  
|{{bug|41514}} || No || I tried the patch and that works fine.
|-
|-
|{{bug|39329}} || I think so ||
|<strike> {{bug|41540}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied
|-
|{{bug|41514}} || No ||
|-
|{{bug|41540}} || No || Patch supplied
|-
|{{bug|41556}} || Yes ||
|-
|-
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there
|-
|{{bug|42708}} || Yes || By Dan Sebald's patch
|-
|-
99

edits

Navigation menu