Status of bugs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (typo) |
|||
| (31 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
!Bug ID !! Status !! Suggested action !! Type !! comments | !Bug ID !! Status !! Suggested action !! Type !! comments | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{bug|31626}} || Patch || || X || ''Can't run odetest.m, "error: handles to nested functions are not yet supported'' | ||
''error: called from'' | |||
''odetest at line 18 column 20'' | |||
''ode_test_script at line 5 column 6"'' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{bug|32008}} || Patch || N/C || M || Needs more documentation so a committer can understand it thoroughly | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | <!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install | ||
|- --> | |||
|<strike> {{bug|33523}} </strike> || Ready for test || Review patch || M || ''Seems to work fine with patch'' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X || Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed". Which version failed? The latest patch seems to work for me -- Lachlan | |||
Newest patch works fine (philip) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all. No progress for two years. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{bug|41512}} || Open || Review patch || M || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |{{bug|42705}} || Patch || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |<strike> {{bug|42850}} </strike> || Fixed || Review patch || C ||''The example in OP works after this patch'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |<strike> {{bug|43511}} </strike> || Patch || Review patch || E ||''Fixes the bug'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{bug|43925}} || Ready for test || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}} ''Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |{{bug|45219}} || None || Review patch || M || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{ | |} | ||
==Breakpoint bugs== | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable" | |||
!Bug ID !! Fixed? !! comments | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |{{bug|33411}} || No || Patch supplied ''See comment in bug report'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |<strike> {{bug|34804}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied ''Patch works fine'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |{{bug|41514}} || No || I tried the patch and that works fine. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{bug| | |<strike> {{bug|41540}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied | ||
|- | |||
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there | |||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 13:15, 3 May 2016
To report a bug, please use the bug tracker.
This page is intended to allow those developers without the authority to change the status of bugs on bug tracker to point out bugs that have been fixed, or other suggested status changes, to those who do have authority to update bug tracker. The goal is that this will be a short list, which is easier for the core developers to scan than the entire bug tracker list. Currently, it is just Lachlan's thoughts on the 50 or so "Patch submitted" bugs.
N/C means no change.
"Types" are chosen so that importance is typically decreasing if sorted by type: C=crash, E=error (wrong result), M=gives error on code Matlab accepts, O=bug in existing Octave functionality that is not part of Matlab, P=performance, X=extension (request to accept code Matlab doesn't accept).)
Bugs
| Bug ID | Status | Suggested action | Type | comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #31626 | Patch | X | Can't run odetest.m, "error: handles to nested functions are not yet supported
error: called from odetest at line 18 column 20 ode_test_script at line 5 column 6" | |
| #32008 | Patch | N/C | M | Needs more documentation so a committer can understand it thoroughly |
| Ready for test | Review patch | M | Seems to work fine with patch | |
| #36372 | Patch | See if "reverse ordinal" is useful | P,X | Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed". Which version failed? The latest patch seems to work for me -- Lachlan
Newest patch works fine (philip) |
| #36646 | Patch | "In progress"? | M | The patches fix some statistical tests but not all. No progress for two years. |
| #41512 | Open | Review patch | M | |
| #42705 | Patch | Review patch | O | Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle |
| Fixed | Review patch | C | The example in OP works after this patch | |
| Patch | Review patch | E | Fixes the bug | |
| #43925 | Ready for test | Review patch | e | Patch also fixes #44498 Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet |
| #44498 | None | see #43925 | e | Disregard patch; use patch for #43925. |
| #45219 | None | Review patch | M | |
| #45654 | Open | Review patch | O | Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle |
Breakpoint bugs
| Bug ID | Fixed? | comments |
|---|---|---|
| #33411 | No | Patch supplied See comment in bug report |
| Yes | Patch supplied Patch works fine | |
| #41514 | No | I tried the patch and that works fine. |
| Yes | Patch supplied | |
| #41845 | Almost | Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there |