Status of bugs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
210 bytes removed ,  14 June 2019
Somehow need to escape for wiki?!
(→‎Bugs: Change status of 33523, 42705, 42825, 42850, 43511)
(Somehow need to escape for wiki?!)
(14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
To report a bug, please use the [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave bug tracker].
{{Warning|This page is outdated and no longer maintained. Please use the [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave bug tracker].}}


This page is intended to allow those developers without the authority to change the status of bugs on bug tracker to point out bugs that have been fixed, or other suggested status changes, to those who do have authority to update bug tracker.  The goal is that this will be a short list, which is easier for the core developers to scan than the entire bug tracker list.  Currently, it is just Lachlan's thoughts on the 50 or so "Patch submitted" bugs.
This page is intended to allow those developers without the authority to change the status of bugs on bug tracker to point out bugs that have been fixed, or other suggested status changes, to those who do have authority to update bug tracker.  The goal is that this will be a short list, which is easier for the core developers to scan than the entire bug tracker list.  Currently, it is just Lachlan's thoughts on the 50 or so "Patch submitted" bugs.
Line 20: Line 20:
<!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install
<!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install
|-  -->
|-  -->
|{{bug|33523}} || Ready for test || Review patch || M || ''Seems to work fine with patch''
|<strike> {{bug|33523}} </strike> || Ready for test || Review patch || M || ''Seems to work fine with patch''
|-
|{{bug|34624}} || Patch || "Duplicate"? || O || Duplicate of #44095?
|-
|-
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X || Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed".  Which version failed? The latest patch seems to work for me -- Lachlan
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X || Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed".  Which version failed? The latest patch seems to work for me -- Lachlan
Newest patch works fine (philip)
|-
|-
|{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all.  No progress for two years.
|{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all.  No progress for two years.
Line 32: Line 31:
|{{bug|42705}} || Patch || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|{{bug|42705}} || Patch || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|-
|-
|{{bug|42825}} || Ready for test || Review patch || E || ''The example in OP works after this patch''
|<strike> {{bug|42850}} </strike> || Fixed || Review patch || C ||''The example in OP works after this patch''
|-
|{{bug|42850}} || Ready for test || Review patch || C ||''The example in OP works after this patch''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43511}} || Patch || Review patch || E ||''Fixes the bug''
|<strike> {{bug|43511}} </strike> || Patch || Review patch || E ||''Fixes the bug''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43925}} || None || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}} ''Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet''
|{{bug|43925}} || Ready for test || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}} ''Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet''
|-
|-
|{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}.
|{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}.
Line 45: Line 42:
|-
|-
|{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|-
|{{bug|46933}} || Confirmed || Review patch || C || The patch solves the crash problem. Please review
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 56: Line 51:
|{{bug|33411}} || No || Patch supplied ''See comment in bug report''
|{{bug|33411}} || No || Patch supplied ''See comment in bug report''
|-
|-
|{{bug|34804}} || No || Patch supplied ''Patch works fine''
|<strike> {{bug|34804}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied ''Patch works fine''
|-
|-
|{{bug|36576}} || Yes ||  
|{{bug|41514}} || No || I tried the patch and that works fine.
|-
|-
|{{bug|39329}} || I think so ||
|<strike> {{bug|41540}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied
|-
|{{bug|41514}} || No ||
|-
|{{bug|41540}} || No || Patch supplied
|-
|{{bug|41556}} || Yes ||
|-
|-
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there
|-
|{{bug|42708}} || Yes || By Dan Sebald's patch
|-
|-

Navigation menu