Status of bugs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Status of bugs (edit)

Revision as of 11:36, 14 June 2019

225 bytes removed ,  14 June 2019
Somehow need to escape for wiki?!
(Somehow need to escape for wiki?!)
(25 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
To report a bug, please use the [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave bug tracker].
{{Warning|This page is outdated and no longer maintained. Please use the [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave bug tracker].}}


This page is intended to allow those developers without the authority to change the status of bugs on bug tracker to point out bugs that have been fixed, or other suggested status changes, to those who do have authority to update bug tracker.  The goal is that this will be a short list, which is easier for the core developers to scan than the entire bug tracker list.  Currently, it is just Lachlan's thoughts on the 50 or so "Patch submitted" bugs.
This page is intended to allow those developers without the authority to change the status of bugs on bug tracker to point out bugs that have been fixed, or other suggested status changes, to those who do have authority to update bug tracker.  The goal is that this will be a short list, which is easier for the core developers to scan than the entire bug tracker list.  Currently, it is just Lachlan's thoughts on the 50 or so "Patch submitted" bugs.
Line 11: Line 11:
!Bug ID !! Status !! Suggested action !! Type !! comments
!Bug ID !! Status !! Suggested action !! Type !! comments
|-
|-
|{{bug|31626}} || Patch || Apply patch || X ||
|{{bug|31626}} || Patch ||   || X || ''Can't run odetest.m, "error: handles to nested functions are not yet supported''
''error: called from''
''odetest at line 18 column 20''
''ode_test_script at line 5 column 6"''
|-
|-
|{{bug|32008}} || Patch || N/C || M || Needs more documentation so a committer can understand it thoroughly
|{{bug|32008}} || Patch || N/C || M || Needs more documentation so a committer can understand it thoroughly
|-
|{{bug|32088}} || Patch || "In progress" || || Existing patch does not meet requirements
|-
|-
<!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install
<!-- {{bug|32839}} || Patch || N/C || O || I (Lachlan) don't understand pkg build / install
|-  -->
|-  -->
|{{bug|32885}} || Patch || Review latest patch || E || Patch is simple..
|<strike> {{bug|33523}} </strike> || Ready for test || Review patch || M || ''Seems to work fine with patch''
|-
|{{bug|32924}} || Patch || "Postponed" || E || Jordi was going to fix this in 2011.  Should re-allocated to "None"?
|-
|{{bug|33503}} || Patch || "closed" || -- || This is just a matter of roundoff
|-
|-
|{{bug|33523}} || Confirmed || Review patch || M ||
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X || Patch fails to apply to dev- "5 out of 5 hunks failed".  Which version failed? The latest patch seems to work for me -- Lachlan
|-
Newest patch works fine (philip)
|{{bug|34363}} || Patch || "None" || P || All supplied patches have been applied
|-
|{{bug|34624}} || Patch || "Duplicate"? || O || Duplicate of #44095?
|-
|{{bug|36372}} || Patch || See if "reverse ordinal" is useful || P,X ||  
|-
|-
|{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all.  No progress for two years.
|{{bug|36646}} || Patch || "In progress"? || M || The patches fix some statistical tests but not all.  No progress for two years.
|-
|{{bug|41315}} || Open || "Fixed" || || Fixed in 4.0.1
|-
|-
|{{bug|41512}} || Open || Review patch || M ||
|{{bug|41512}} || Open || Review patch || M ||
|-
|-
|{{bug|42705}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|{{bug|42705}} || Patch || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|-
|{{bug|42825}} || Confirmed || Review patch || E ||
|-
|{{bug|42850}} || Confirmed || Review patch || C ||
|-
|-
|{{bug|43038}} || Needs Info || Mark as duplicate of {{bug|33523}} || M ||
|<strike> {{bug|42850}} </strike> || Fixed || Review patch || C ||''The example in OP works after this patch''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43511}} || None || Review patch || E ||
|<strike> {{bug|43511}} </strike> || Patch || Review patch || E ||''Fixes the bug''
|-
|-
|{{bug|43925}} || None || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}}
|{{bug|43925}} || Ready for test || Review patch || e || Patch also fixes {{bug|44498}} ''Patch applies + builds fine, had no time to test yet''
|-
|-
|{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}.
|{{bug|44498}} || None || see {{bug|43925}} || e || Disregard patch; use patch for {{bug|43925}}.
Line 56: Line 42:
|-
|-
|{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|{{bug|45654}} || Open || Review patch || O || Patch will need polishing after approval-in-principle
|-
|{{bug|46933}} || Confirmed || Review patch || C || The patch solves the crash problem. Please review
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 65: Line 49:
!Bug ID !! Fixed? !! comments
!Bug ID !! Fixed? !! comments
|-
|-
|{{bug|33411}} || No ||  
|{{bug|33411}} || No || Patch supplied ''See comment in bug report''
|-
|-
|{{bug|34804}} || No || Patch supplied
|<strike> {{bug|34804}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied ''Patch works fine''
|-
|-
|{{bug|36576}} || Yes ||  
|{{bug|41514}} || No || I tried the patch and that works fine.
|-
|-
|{{bug|39329}} || I think so ||
|<strike> {{bug|41540}} </strike> || Yes || Patch supplied
|-
|{{bug|41514}} || No ||
|-
|{{bug|41540}} || No || The fix is simple.
|-
|{{bug|41556}} || Yes ||  
|-
|-
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there
|{{bug|41845}} || Almost || Must use dbstop syntax, but functionality is there
|-
|{{bug|42708}} || Yes || By Dan Sebald's patch
|-
|-
Retrieved from "https://wiki.octave.org/Special:MobileDiff/7433...12077"

Navigation menu