115
edits
Short projects: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Fgnievinski (talk | contribs) (→Missing functions: grouping is a task too) |
Fgnievinski (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The list is meant to be dynamic -- please add, remove, and comment on it. And since the things are likely to be of short duration, don't ask if is there is anyone already working on it. Projects of long duration should be added to the [[Projects]] page instead. | The list is meant to be dynamic -- please add, remove, and comment on it. And since the things are likely to be of short duration, don't ask if is there is anyone already working on it. Projects of long duration should be added to the [[Projects]] page instead. | ||
Most of the small and easy bugs are caught and fixed quickly by the Octave developers. The best way to catch an easy one is then to [https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/octave-bug-tracker | Most of the small and easy bugs are caught and fixed quickly by the Octave developers. The best way to catch an easy one is then to [https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/octave-bug-tracker subscribe to the bug tracker] (note that this has a lot of activity so you'll probably prefer to receive a digest). | ||
{{warning| do not simply add a patch/file to the bug or patch tracker. Always leave a comment at the same time, even if it just a simple "I prepared a change that should fix it". If there is no comment, it's hard to notice that a patch was added since there will be no notice on the discussion about it.}} | {{warning| do not simply add a patch/file to the bug or patch tracker. Always leave a comment at the same time, even if it just a simple "I prepared a change that should fix it". If there is no comment, it's hard to notice that a patch was added since there will be no notice on the discussion about it.}} | ||