Reviewing Octave Forge packages: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Remove redundant Category:Packages.
m (Remove redundant Category:Packages.)
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Help reviewing Octave-Forge packages ==
== Help reviewing Octave Forge packages ==


We need help. Here is how:
We need help. Here is how:
Line 22: Line 22:
[ ] maintainer has specified a corresponding revision commit/changeset
[ ] maintainer has specified a corresponding revision commit/changeset
[ ] checkout code from Sourceforge, commit/changeset is present
[ ] checkout code from Sourceforge, commit/changeset is present
== Compile and Install ==
== Compile and Install ==
[ ] release candidate installs on latest stable Octave release
[ ] release candidate installs on latest stable Octave release
[ ] no compiler errors or warnings
[ ] no compiler errors or warnings
[ ] ran tests using <code>runtests /path/to/pkg</code>
[ ] ran tests using <code>runtests /path/to/pkg</code> (use <code>oruntests</code> instead in Octave 6.0.0 or later)
[ ] ran all tests, including those in src (how??)
[ ] ran all tests, including those in src (how??)
[ ] ran doctest on all functions (optional)
[ ] ran doctest on all functions (optional)
Line 31: Line 32:
[ ] no makeinfo errors and warnings during HTML build
[ ] no makeinfo errors and warnings during HTML build
[ ] unpacked and spot-checked the generated HTML documentation
[ ] unpacked and spot-checked the generated HTML documentation
== Interaction with pkg ==
== Interaction with pkg ==
[ ] <code>pkg load foo</code> runs with errors or warnings
[ ] <code>pkg load foo</code> runs with errors or warnings
Line 40: Line 42:
     *  ________
     *  ________


== Package files ==
== Package files in release candidate tarball ==
[ ] tested with minimum Octave version list in DESCRIPTION
[ ] tested with minimum Octave version list in DESCRIPTION
[ ] reasonable dependencies listed in DESCRIPTION
[ ] reasonable dependencies listed in DESCRIPTION
[ ] NEWS file makes sense, version and date match
[ ] NEWS file makes sense, version and date match
[ ] All functions are listed in INDEX
[ ] All functions are listed in INDEX
[ ] check licenses (<code>licensecheck -r</code> "plus some manual checks").
[ ] package files are readable/executable by all users (reasonably current maintainer Makefile should be doing this).
[ ] version number in src/configure.ac (if present) matches DESCRIPTION and tarball name.
[ ] any version numbers within the help or function body (e.g., banners) matches above.
[ ] contains no hidden dot files, junk backup files, results of configure runs, etc (should be taken care of by maintainer Makefile).
</pre>
</pre>


Line 72: Line 79:


[[Category:Octave Forge]]
[[Category:Octave Forge]]
[[Category:Packages]]

Navigation menu