Plot comparison

From Octave
Revision as of 03:31, 7 January 2020 by Andy1978 (talk | contribs) (Updated plot comparison with Octave 6.0.0 and ML2019)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Generated on 06-Jan-2020 22:54:31 by html_compare_plot_demos with GNU Octave 6.0.0
  • gnuplot 5.2
  • Qt-painters
  • Qt-opengl
  • ML2019 (FIXME: diary.log is missing)

Visual comparison of plot files from until compare_plot_demos_09.html

You can find the scripts which are used to create these plots in scripts/testfun/private.

Attention: The info below is from 2016 and might be outdated


gnuplot 4.6

There are a lot of gnuplot differences and it might be nice to fix those, but someone would have to take an interest. Octave is moving towards OpenGL for all plotting so most developers focuses on bug fixes for that toolkit.

Qt and gnuplot (independent of the used graphics_toolkit)

Matlab errors due to incompatibilities

won't fix or Octave only feature

  • matlab comet3_01, comet.png: Only the beginning of the animation is printed. Matlab implements comet in a completely different way which means printing isn't really possible for them.
  • matlab polar_03, polar_05: Modifying ticks for rho (rticks) and theta (tticks) is an Octave addition.
  • matlab polar_04: Modifying color and text properties in polar plot is an Octave addition.
  • Multiple Matlab plots with "Error in color/linetype argument". This is because adding legend keys with ";" in plot like "plot(1:10, "; a ramp;)" is an Octave only addition.