219
edits
Plot comparison: Difference between revisions
m
→needs some work: add big space between colorbar and plot
(→won't fix or Octave only feature: add polar plot ml differences) |
m (→needs some work: add big space between colorbar and plot) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [http://tech-chat.de/compare_plot_demos/gnuplot/colorbar_23_1.png gnuplot] + [http://tech-chat.de/compare_plot_demos/fltk/colorbar_23_1.png fltk] colorbar_23_1: xtick unreadable. It should check the text_extent and reduce xticks if the xlabels would overlap. | * [http://tech-chat.de/compare_plot_demos/gnuplot/colorbar_23_1.png gnuplot] + [http://tech-chat.de/compare_plot_demos/fltk/colorbar_23_1.png fltk] colorbar_23_1: xtick unreadable. It should check the text_extent and reduce xticks if the xlabels would overlap. | ||
* [http://tech-chat.de/compare_plot_demos/gnuplot/colorbar_01_1.png gnuplot] + [http://tech-chat.de/compare_plot_demos/fltk/colorbar_01_1.png fltk] colorbar* : This is just a matter of taste but I would prefer a smaller gap (only 40% of the current implementation?) between colorbar and the plot like ml does. | |||
* gnuplot + ftlk: fill_01_1, fill_02_1: hidden edges keep visible in ML, not with fltk or gnuplot. This seems to be a ML bug when printing to PNG or JPEG and works (same output like gnuplot+fltk) when printing to ps. In FLTK the on-screen images shows the hidden edge and becomes invisible when printing. | * gnuplot + ftlk: fill_01_1, fill_02_1: hidden edges keep visible in ML, not with fltk or gnuplot. This seems to be a ML bug when printing to PNG or JPEG and works (same output like gnuplot+fltk) when printing to ps. In FLTK the on-screen images shows the hidden edge and becomes invisible when printing. | ||