PVS static analyzer - 5.0 Release: Difference between revisions

m
Mark bug "Won't Fix"
m (Mark bug fixed)
m (Mark bug "Won't Fix")
Line 7,062: Line 7,062:
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
       <td style='width: 30%;'><div title="/home/pavel/oct/octave/libinterp/corefcn/gsvd.cc">gsvd.cc (184)</div></td>
       <td style='width: 30%; text-decoration: line-through;'><div title="/home/pavel/oct/octave/libinterp/corefcn/gsvd.cc">gsvd.cc (184)</div></td>
       <td style='width: 5%;'>[https://www.viva64.com/en/w/v656/ V656]</td>
       <td style='width: 5%;'>[https://www.viva64.com/en/w/v656/ V656]</td>
       <td style='width: 65%;'>Variables 'retval(0)', 'retval(1)' are initialized through the call to the same function. It's probably an error or un-optimized code. Consider inspecting the 'octave::float_identity_matrix(nc, nc)' expression. Check lines: 183, 184.</td>
       <td style='width: 65%;'>Variables 'retval(0)', 'retval(1)' are initialized through the call to the same function. It's probably an error or un-optimized code. Consider inspecting the 'octave::float_identity_matrix(nc, nc)' expression. Check lines: 183, 184.</td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
       <td style='width: 30%;'><div title="/home/pavel/oct/octave/libinterp/corefcn/gsvd.cc">gsvd.cc (197)</div></td>
       <td style='width: 30%; text-decoration: line-through;'><div title="/home/pavel/oct/octave/libinterp/corefcn/gsvd.cc">gsvd.cc (197)</div></td>
       <td style='width: 5%;'>[https://www.viva64.com/en/w/v656/ V656]</td>
       <td style='width: 5%;'>[https://www.viva64.com/en/w/v656/ V656]</td>
       <td style='width: 65%;'>Variables 'retval(0)', 'retval(1)' are initialized through the call to the same function. It's probably an error or un-optimized code. Consider inspecting the 'octave::identity_matrix(nc, nc)' expression. Check lines: 196, 197.</td>
       <td style='width: 65%;'>Variables 'retval(0)', 'retval(1)' are initialized through the call to the same function. It's probably an error or un-optimized code. Consider inspecting the 'octave::identity_matrix(nc, nc)' expression. Check lines: 196, 197.</td>
1,072

edits