Online Developer Meeting (2022-09-27): Difference between revisions

(→‎Today's topics: added topic about older GSoC projects yet to be added.)
Line 5: Line 5:


* GSoC updates
* GSoC updates
** '''GSoC successfully completed.'''
** '''Three candidates submitted code.'''
** '''Sarrah spoke about her contributions (Carlo was not present)'''
* Since this is the end of GSoC should Sudeepam' {{bug|46881}} be reviewed for version 8? siko1056 asked why this could not be included in version 7 in 2020.
** Should the GSoC patches/bugs be labeled as (GSoC <yyyy>) so these are easier to catch?
** '''Kai mentioned old GSoC contributions that had not been merged into the tree yet. JWE asked Kai to make a list of such changes, and the people who can review them will need to be rounded up so it can all be merged.'''
* Octave 7.3 and 8 release timeline.
* Octave 7.3 and 8 release timeline.
** Octave 7. 1 was released late (April instead of Jan) and there was interest in releasing Octave 8.1 earlier. Specifics to discuss:
** Octave 7. 1 was released late (April instead of Jan) and there was interest in releasing Octave 8.1 earlier. Specifics to discuss:
** Should we merge default to stable early? October?
** Should we merge default to stable early? October?
** Should we skip 7.3 and go straight to 8?
** Should we skip 7.3 and go straight to 8?
** '''Agreed on releasing 8 according to timeline, so merge default to stable in early November'''
** '''Agreed on releasing 7.3 in October'''
** '''jwe would prefer 8.1 to also list the bugfixes not just the new features. Bugfixes are listed for point releases like 7.2 but not yet for new releases.'''


* Since this is the end of GSoC should Sudeepam' {{bug|46881}} be reviewed for version 8? siko1056 asked why this could not be included in version 7 in 2020.
* ```JWE mentioned old submitted patches (not just GSoC) that are languishing in Savannah without being reviewed or accepted. Asked us all to go through patches and review / accept them.```
** Should the GSoC patches/bugs be labeled as (GSoC <yyyy>) so these are easier to catch?
 
* '''Changing PCRE to PCRE2'''
** '''JWE mentioned having to make those changes in regexp functions, but changes are fairly localized, so hopefully easy to make'''
 
* '''Add memoize as a feature:'''
** '''Arun will update Guillaume's contribution from last year and seek reviews/push in the next couple of weeks'''
 
* '''Discussion on adding a hashing algorithm to Octave for Matlab compatibility:'''
** '''JWE and Guillaume discussed Matlab 2022b's behavior on their new dictionary type.'''
** '''JWE thinks Octave should accommodate "double.empty" and similar constructs from Matlab.'''


== Previous topics ==
== Previous topics ==
171

edits