Editing Online Developer Meeting (2022-02-22)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== Release process of Octave 7.1 === | === Release process of Octave 7.1 === | ||
* Blocking issues: | * Blocking issues: 9 bugs targeting 7.0.90, 3 marked as "ready for test" (see [https://octave.space/savannah/# Savannah overview on octave.space]) | ||
* Good progress on some of the blocking issues by jwe. Most important remaining ones: | * Good progress on some of the blocking issues by jwe. Most important remaining ones: | ||
** bug {{bug|61788}}: arrays of type int16 contain wrong numbers | ** bug {{bug|61788}}: arrays of type int16 contain wrong numbers | ||
*** The <code>:</code>-operator will probably be changed to return an array (instead of a range object) before Octave 7. | *** The <code>:</code>-operator will probably be changed to return an array (instead of a range object) before Octave 7. Not started yet. | ||
** bug {{bug|61813}}: memory management bug when calling MEX that returns an output] | |||
*** @jwe provided an initial changeset. That will also revert to copying from the .mex interface unless Octave is compiled with C++17 pmr. | |||
** bug {{bug|61821}}: segfault using tree_parameter_list in oct file] | |||
** bug {{bug|61813}}: memory management bug when calling MEX that returns an output | *** Lower priority, only 32-bit (only on Windows?). Probably not a blocker. | ||
*** @jwe | |||
** bug {{bug|61821}}: segfault using tree_parameter_list in oct file | |||
*** Lower priority, only 32-bit (only on Windows?). | |||
** bug {{bug|61898}}: subsref: Error when field syntax is used on non-scalar @class object | ** bug {{bug|61898}}: subsref: Error when field syntax is used on non-scalar @class object | ||
*** Not a bug in Octave core. Recent changes to output argument validation uncovered an issue in interval package. | *** Not a bug in Octave core. Recent changes to output argument validation uncovered an issue in interval package. | ||
** Similar bug {{bug|61843}}: Regression with subscripted assignments with arrays of objects | ** Similar bug {{bug|61843}}: Regression with subscripted assignments with arrays of objects | ||
*** Older regression. | *** Older regression. | ||
=== Minimum Qt5 version for Octave 8? === | === Minimum Qt5 version for Octave 8? === | ||
* See [https://octave.discourse.group/t/qt5-15-already-unsupported-upstream-except-commercial-license/737/15 Qt5.15 already unsupported upstream (except commercial license)?] | * See [https://octave.discourse.group/t/qt5-15-already-unsupported-upstream-except-commercial-license/737/15 Qt5.15 already unsupported upstream (except commercial license)?] | ||
== Previous topics == | == Previous topics == |