Interval package: Difference between revisions

Interval package (edit)

Revision as of 18:52, 18 January 2015

68 bytes removed , 18 January 2015

m

→‎What to expect: Typo & formatting

Oheim

240

edits

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 {| class="wikitable" style="margin: auto; align:right"
-|+align="bottom" | Approximate runtime (wall clock time in seconds) on an Intel® Core™ i5-4340M CPU
+|+ Approximate runtime (wall clock time in seconds) on an<br/>Intel® Core™ i5-4340M CPU (2.9 GHz)
 !Matrix dimension
 !Interval <code>plus</code>
@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 !Interval <code>inv</code>
 |-
-|align="right"| 10
+| 10
 |align="right"| < 0.1
 |align="right"| < 0.1
@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 |align="right"| 3.3
 |-
-|align="right"| 20
+| 20
 |align="right"| < 0.1
 |align="right"| < 0.1
@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 |style="text-align:right; font-weight: bold; color:orange"| 32.3
 |-
-|align="right"| 30
+| 30
 |align="right"| < 0.1
 |align="right"| < 0.1
@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 |style="text-align:right; font-weight: bold; color:red"| 142.1
 |-
-|align="right"| 40
+| 40
 |align="right"| < 0.1
 |align="right"| 0.1
 |align="right"| 15.6
+|
 |-
-|align="right"| 50
+| 50
 |align="right"| 0.1
 |align="right"| 0.2
 |style="text-align:right; font-weight: bold; color:orange"| 29.1
+|
 |}
 ''Why is the interval package accurate?''
-The GNU Octave builtin floating-point routines are not useful for interval arithmetic: Their results depend on hardware, system libraries and compilation options.
+The GNU Octave built-in floating-point routines are not useful for interval arithmetic: Their results depend on hardware, system libraries and compilation options.
 The interval package handles all arithmetic functions with the help of the [http://www.mpfr.org/ GNU MPFR library]. With MPFR it is possible to compute system-independent, valid and tight enclosures of the correct results.