FAQ: Difference between revisions

17 bytes added ,  14 November 2012
m
Line 61: Line 61:
Pointing to http://www.octave.org is good, because that gives people a direct way to find out more. If citation of a URL is not allowed by a publisher you can use this entry:
Pointing to http://www.octave.org is good, because that gives people a direct way to find out more. If citation of a URL is not allowed by a publisher you can use this entry:


     @MISC{octave:2012,
     <nowiki>@MISC{octave:2012,
     author = {{Octave community}},
     author = {{Octave community}},
     keywords = {Octave,Software},
     keywords = {Octave,Software},
Line 67: Line 67:
     url = {www.gnu.org/software/octave/},
     url = {www.gnu.org/software/octave/},
     year = {2012}
     year = {2012}
     }
     }</nowiki>


if you also want to point to a traditional reference, then you can cite the Octave manual:
if you also want to point to a traditional reference, then you can cite the Octave manual:
657

edits