Difference between revisions of "Commit message guidelines"

From Octave
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
Our commit messages for Mercurial get automaticallyo distilled into GNU Changelog entries. The GNU coding standards have [http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html some guidelines] for how to write Changelogs, and since Octave is a GNU project, we try to produce Changelogs in this style. However, certain things have to be adapted because the style in there is primarily for C sources, and because we are producing them from Mercurial commit messages.
+
Our commit messages for Mercurial get automatically distilled into GNU Changelog entries. The GNU coding standards have [http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html some guidelines] for how to write Changelogs, and since Octave is a GNU project, we try to produce Changelogs in this style. However, certain things have to be adapted because the style in there is primarily for C sources, and because we are producing them from Mercurial commit messages.
  
 
You can see how Mercurial will produce the Changelog-style output with the following command:
 
You can see how Mercurial will produce the Changelog-style output with the following command:

Revision as of 05:34, 18 March 2012

Our commit messages for Mercurial get automatically distilled into GNU Changelog entries. The GNU coding standards have some guidelines for how to write Changelogs, and since Octave is a GNU project, we try to produce Changelogs in this style. However, certain things have to be adapted because the style in there is primarily for C sources, and because we are producing them from Mercurial commit messages.

You can see how Mercurial will produce the Changelog-style output with the following command:

 hg log --style changelog

Guidelines

One-line description

The commit message has a one-line description. Keep it short, preferrably under 80 characters. If you're squashing a bug, the bug number you're squashing should be included in this one-line description, like so at the end: (bug #12345). Omit final period (full stop).

Sometimes the one-line description is sufficient, for small changes. In that case, we use the following prefixes to give a description of what the small change is:

  • maint: for reorganisation of the sources that do not change the source. Regular merge commits are a prominent example.
  • doc: for changes to the documentation.

If your change only touches one file, then the filename of that file should be the prefix of the one-line description. If it's a C++ or C file, the function or class that is being modified should be included in the parenthetical remark, as in the full body of the commit message.

Body of the commit message

If there is more than file touched in different ways and the one-line description isn't enough to describe all changes, the commit message needs a full-body description.

Individual files you touched get their changes separately enumerated. If there a particular C or C++ function you changed, the general format is

   * file.cc (class1::function1): Made change foo. 
     (class2::function2): Made change bar.

Note the newline for describing the change to a different function. General GNU style guidelines can be followed here, so that similar changes to different files can be grouped.

For style points, please also write "New function" instead of "Added function" or "Return retval" instead of "Changed to return retval".

And please, never "Fixed bug" or similar. That doesn't add any specific information about what was changed.

The changelog info in the commit message should say what changed, not why. If you need to explain why, that info should probably go in comments in the code.

For m-script and Fortran sources, the function name can be omitted if the m-script only contains one file. For changes outside of functions or classes, of course the parenthetical (function) or (class::function) specifiers can also be omitted.