Gouzouni

Joined 3 March 2014
Line 69: Line 69:
* I have selected two tasks from the proposals list. The first is the development of the symbolic package [http://wiki.octave.org/Summer_of_Code_Project_Ideas#Rewrite_symbolic_package link ] and the second one is the improvement of the MPI package [http://wiki.octave.org/Summer_of_Code_Project_Ideas#Improve_MPI_package link ]. I would really like to work on any of these tasks but the truth is that if I had to choose I would go with the symbolic package.
* I have selected two tasks from the proposals list. The first is the development of the symbolic package [http://wiki.octave.org/Summer_of_Code_Project_Ideas#Rewrite_symbolic_package link ] and the second one is the improvement of the MPI package [http://wiki.octave.org/Summer_of_Code_Project_Ideas#Improve_MPI_package link ]. I would really like to work on any of these tasks but the truth is that if I had to choose I would go with the symbolic package.


* I haven't come with an actual time line yet and here is where I would appreciate some comments. How realistic is it to expect to have the symbolic
I think that the symbolic package is one of the most usually used from the users of programs like Octave, and this is why I want to work on it.
package half or more done at the end of the GSoC? What about fully completing it? (By fully I mean having the main trunk done, there will always
I have build Octave's Development Sources and I am currently reading the code from the symbolic and the multi - precision package.
be something to add). I will add a time line for each one of the above projects after a while.
67

edits