Online Developer Meeting (2024-05-28): Difference between revisions

From Octave
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:


== Today's topics ==
== Today's topics ==
* Timing for next bugfix release
* Old business:
** We've used just 483GB of our 4000GB Digital Ocean outbound data transfer limit so far in May.
** Timing for next bugfix release: Expected by now, but delayed again because of bugs(?) - do we need another release candidate?
* GSoC
* GSoC
* Octave in MSYS2 (binary distributor for Windows MinGW)
* Octave in MSYS2 (binary distributor for Windows MinGW)

Revision as of 14:24, 28 May 2024

Today's topics

  • Old business:
    • We've used just 483GB of our 4000GB Digital Ocean outbound data transfer limit so far in May.
    • Timing for next bugfix release: Expected by now, but delayed again because of bugs(?) - do we need another release candidate?
  • GSoC
  • Octave in MSYS2 (binary distributor for Windows MinGW)
  • OctConf
  • Using Octave 10 (or 11?) to introduce the string class and other changes that will break backward compatibility without the usual two-release deprecation period (jwe).

Previous topics

  • Timing for next bugfix release
  • GSoC projects
    • 8 applications
    • Selection the day after the meeting
  • OctConf 2024
  • Roadmap and priorities for Octave 10
  • Discuss a potential timeline for native string class support
    • Blocker: Inability to save classdef objects to files. Potentially realizable in incremental steps:
      • Implement a low-level HDF5 interface that is usable from .m code.
      • Implement saving double arrays in Matlab-compatible -v7.3 format in .m files.
      • Implement saving in that format for other types (including classdef).
  • Should we make and distribute nightly builds for Windows for the default branch?
    • Traffic from Digital Ocean limited to 4 TB. (Higher monthly rate if exceeded?)
    • Probably no additional nightly build configurations for now.
  • Octave in MSYS2 (binary distributor for Windows MinGW)

See also