Online Developer Meeting (2025-10-28): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Add commentary on discussion topics) |
m (Add commentary on discussion topics) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Status of 10.3 release '''jwe will have release tarballs in next 24 hours. Release can happen within the week''' | * Status of 10.3 release '''jwe will have release tarballs in next 24 hours. Release can happen within the week''' | ||
* brief GSoC summer 2025 summary '''It went very well, and the reason seems to have been the quality of the candidates both in terms of technical ability and | * brief GSoC summer 2025 summary '''It went very well, and the reason seems to have been the quality of the candidates both in terms of technical ability and personal motivation.''' | ||
** CBM and/or Andreas | ** CBM and/or Andreas | ||
* Status of contract project with Thomas Kolman '''Will go forward with an initial contract'' | * Status of contract project with Thomas Kolman '''Will go forward with an initial contract''' | ||
** (Moved up in agenda as Thomas can only attend the first part of the meeting) | ** (Moved up in agenda as Thomas can only attend the first part of the meeting) | ||
** a brief summary of the proposed work | ** a brief summary of the proposed work |
Latest revision as of 08:59, 24 September 2025
- Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 @ 18:00 UTC Convert timezones here!
- Location: https://meet.jit.si/octave-dev
Today's topics
Previous topics
- Status of 10.3 release jwe will have release tarballs in next 24 hours. Release can happen within the week
- brief GSoC summer 2025 summary It went very well, and the reason seems to have been the quality of the candidates both in terms of technical ability and personal motivation.
- CBM and/or Andreas
- Status of contract project with Thomas Kolman Will go forward with an initial contract
- (Moved up in agenda as Thomas can only attend the first part of the meeting)
- a brief summary of the proposed work
- time for questions?
- Converting graphics properties to CamelCase for Matlab compatibility (Decision was already made to do this, questions are about implementation)
- Should base list of property names for each object
1) be stored as std::set<std::string>
, but with property name in lowercase (using genprops.awk
)?
2) be stored as std::set<caseless_str>
with property name in CamelCase?
- Change text emitted for
octave --version
(https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?67520)? Add language about GPL
- Eliminate caching in
simple_fcn_handle
class (bug #67495)? Maybe, jwe will review and think more
See also
- Next meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2025-11-25)
- Prev meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2025-09-23)