Online Developer Meeting (2024-09-24): Difference between revisions

From Octave
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Update notes from last meeting.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
== Today's topics ==
== Today's topics ==


* GSoC?
* GSoC:
* Plans for Octave 9.3.0?
** The projects that Andreas mentored successfully finished.
* Thoughts about liboctmex?
** No information on the project that Colin mentored during the meeting.
* Plans for Octave 9.3.0:
** Target for merging the default branch to the stable branch in 6-8 weeks.
** Postpone decision about releasing 9.3.0 for a few more weeks.
* Targets for Octave 10:
** Given the remaining time until the branches are merged, implementing Table or String classes for Octave 10 might not be reasonable.
** Implementing the arguments block might also be too large.
** Maybe, go ahead and merge the changes for the command window widget from here: https://octave.discourse.group/t/new-command-window-widget/501/82 (or the modified version from the following comment)
* Thoughts about liboctmex:
** Go ahead and apply for Octave 10
** Maybe consider versioned symbols instead of bumping the SOVERSION for ABI/API breaking changes in the future?
* Visibility attributes:
** Many (member) functions are marked (as opposed to the entire class) to allow for inline definitions of (member) functions in headers.
** Might still be incomplete (probably less complete in liboctinterp than in liboctave)
* Virtual OctConf. Is it happening?


== Previous topics ==
== Previous topics ==

Latest revision as of 06:35, 26 September 2024

Today's topics[edit]

  • GSoC:
    • The projects that Andreas mentored successfully finished.
    • No information on the project that Colin mentored during the meeting.
  • Plans for Octave 9.3.0:
    • Target for merging the default branch to the stable branch in 6-8 weeks.
    • Postpone decision about releasing 9.3.0 for a few more weeks.
  • Targets for Octave 10:
    • Given the remaining time until the branches are merged, implementing Table or String classes for Octave 10 might not be reasonable.
    • Implementing the arguments block might also be too large.
    • Maybe, go ahead and merge the changes for the command window widget from here: https://octave.discourse.group/t/new-command-window-widget/501/82 (or the modified version from the following comment)
  • Thoughts about liboctmex:
    • Go ahead and apply for Octave 10
    • Maybe consider versioned symbols instead of bumping the SOVERSION for ABI/API breaking changes in the future?
  • Visibility attributes:
    • Many (member) functions are marked (as opposed to the entire class) to allow for inline definitions of (member) functions in headers.
    • Might still be incomplete (probably less complete in liboctinterp than in liboctave)
  • Virtual OctConf. Is it happening?

Previous topics[edit]

  • Progress update on GSoC projects
  • OctConf 2024
  • Targets for Octave 10

See also[edit]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=Online_Developer_Meeting_(2024-09-24)&oldid=15229"