TISEAN package: Difference between revisions

54 bytes removed ,  8 June 2015
m
Line 20: Line 20:
[dim_hen, frac_hen] = false_nearest (hen(:,1));
[dim_hen, frac_hen] = false_nearest (hen(:,1));
[dim_hen_noisy, frac_hen_noisy] = false_nearest (hen_noisy(:,1));
[dim_hen_noisy, frac_hen_noisy] = false_nearest (hen_noisy(:,1));
plot (dim_ikd, frac_ikd, '-b*;Ikeda;', 'markersize', 15,...
plot (dim_ikd, frac_ikd, '-b*;Ikeda;',...
       dim_hen, frac_hen, '-r+;Henon;', 'markersize', 15,...
       dim_hen, frac_hen, '-r+;Henon;',...
       dim_hen_noisy, frac_hen_noisy, '-gx;Henon Noisy;', 'markersize', 15);
       dim_hen_noisy, frac_hen_noisy, '-gx;Henon Noisy;');
</syntaxhighlight>}}
</syntaxhighlight>}}
The {{Codeline|dim_*}} variables hold the dimension (so here 1:5), and {{Codeline|frac_*}} contain the fraction of false nearest neighbors. From this chart we can obtain the sufficient embedding dimension for each system. For a Henon Map {{Codeline|m &#61; 2}} is sufficient, but for an Ikeda map it is better to use {{Codeline|m &#61; 3}}.
The {{Codeline|dim_*}} variables hold the dimension (so here 1:5), and {{Codeline|frac_*}} contain the fraction of false nearest neighbors. From this chart we can obtain the sufficient embedding dimension for each system. For a Henon Map {{Codeline|m &#61; 2}} is sufficient, but for an Ikeda map it is better to use {{Codeline|m &#61; 3}}.
657

edits