Online Developer Meeting (2025-10-28): Difference between revisions

From Octave
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Add commentary on discussion topics)
m (Add commentary on discussion topics)
Line 7: Line 7:


* Status of 10.3 release '''jwe will have release tarballs in next 24 hours.  Release can happen within the week'''
* Status of 10.3 release '''jwe will have release tarballs in next 24 hours.  Release can happen within the week'''
* brief GSoC summer 2025 summary '''It went very well, and the reason seems to have been the quality of the candidates both in terms of technical ability and  
* brief GSoC summer 2025 summary '''It went very well, and the reason seems to have been the quality of the candidates both in terms of technical ability and personal motivation.'''
** CBM and/or Andreas
** CBM and/or Andreas
* Status of contract project with Thomas Kolman '''Will go forward with an initial contract''
* Status of contract project with Thomas Kolman '''Will go forward with an initial contract''

Revision as of 08:58, 24 September 2025

Today's topics

Previous topics

  • Status of 10.3 release jwe will have release tarballs in next 24 hours. Release can happen within the week
  • brief GSoC summer 2025 summary It went very well, and the reason seems to have been the quality of the candidates both in terms of technical ability and personal motivation.
    • CBM and/or Andreas
  • Status of contract project with Thomas Kolman 'Will go forward with an initial contract
    • (Moved up in agenda as Thomas can only attend the first part of the meeting)
    • a brief summary of the proposed work
    • time for questions?
  • Converting graphics properties to CamelCase for Matlab compatibility (Decision was already made to do this, questions are about implementation)
    • Should base list of property names for each object

1) be stored as std::set<std::string>, but with property name in lowercase (using genprops.awk)?

2) be stored as std::set<caseless_str> with property name in CamelCase?

  • Eliminate caching in simple_fcn_handle class (bug #67495)? Maybe, jwe will review and think more

See also