117
edits
Online Developer Meeting (2025-08-26): Difference between revisions
Online Developer Meeting (2025-08-26) (view source)
Revision as of 16:35, 26 August 2025
, 26 August→Today's topics
m (Add new topics) |
Pr0m1th3as (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Should Octave be built without debugging code for parser by default? | * Should Octave be built without debugging code for parser by default? | ||
The debugging code is always there and always enabled. For every statement parsed there is a check on the the parse_debug_flag to see whether debugging information should be printed. But, this is really infrequently used code. I have turned on the debugger in the parser just once in 10 years. To me, this is specialist code that could be enabled by a developer during configuration or with a `-D` option to `cpp`, but ordinary users will never need this. | The debugging code is always there and always enabled. For every statement parsed there is a check on the the parse_debug_flag to see whether debugging information should be printed. But, this is really infrequently used code. I have turned on the debugger in the parser just once in 10 years. To me, this is specialist code that could be enabled by a developer during configuration or with a `-D` option to `cpp`, but ordinary users will never need this. | ||
* Modify the <code>test</code> function to search for an additional suffix <code>.octdm</code> dedicated to separate files containing demo block. See relevant discussion at https://octave.discourse.group/t/adding-a-new-file-extension-for-demo-files/6716 | |||
== Previous topics == | == Previous topics == | ||