254
edits
Online Developer Meeting (2024-09-24): Difference between revisions
Online Developer Meeting (2024-09-24) (view source)
Revision as of 06:34, 26 September 2024
, 26 September 2024Add some notes from meeting
Pr0m1th3as (talk | contribs) |
(Add some notes from meeting) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Today's topics == | == Today's topics == | ||
* GSoC | * GSoC: | ||
* Plans for Octave 9.3.0 | ** The projects that Andreas mentored successfully finished. | ||
* Thoughts about liboctmex | ** No information on the project that Colin mentored during the meeting. | ||
* Plans for Octave 9.3.0: | |||
** Target for merging the default branch to the stable branch in 6-8 weeks. | |||
** Postpone decision about releasing 9.3.0 for a few more weeks. | |||
* Targets for Octave 10: | |||
** Given the remaining time until the branches are merged, implementing Table or String classes for Octave 10 might not be reasonable. | |||
** Implementing the arguments block might also be too large. | |||
** Maybe, go ahead and merge the changes for the command window widget from here: https://octave.discourse.group/t/new-command-window-widget/501/82 (or the modified version from the following comment) | |||
* Thoughts about liboctmex: | |||
** Go ahead and apply for Octave 10 | |||
* Visibility attributes: | |||
** Many (member) functions are marked (as opposed to the entire class) to allow for inline definitions of (member) functions in headers. | |||
** Might still be incomplete (probably less complete in liboctinterp than in liboctave) | |||
* Virtual OctConf. Is it happening? | * Virtual OctConf. Is it happening? | ||