Online Developer Meeting (2024-04-23): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Today's topics: Update with notes from meeting) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Today's topics == | == Today's topics == | ||
* Timing for next bugfix release | * Timing for next bugfix release | ||
** potential blocker(?): [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?65605 bug #65605]: Octave call to function figure(); results in segfault with Qt6 6.7.0 | |||
** '''jwe creates release candidate (see: [https://octave.discourse.group/t/release-candidate-for-octave-9-2-0-available/5579 Release candidate for Octave 9.2.0 available]''' | |||
* GSoC projects | * GSoC projects | ||
** '''8 applications''' | |||
** '''Selection the day after the meeting''' | |||
* OctConf 2024 | * OctConf 2024 | ||
* Roadmap and priorities for Octave 10 | * Roadmap and priorities for Octave 10 | ||
* Discuss a potential timeline for native string class support | * Discuss a potential timeline for native string class support | ||
** '''Blocker: Inability to save classdef objects to files. Potentially realizable in incremental steps:''' | |||
*** '''Implement a low-level HDF5 interface that is usable from .m code.''' | |||
*** '''Implement saving double arrays in Matlab-compatible -v7.3 format in .m files.''' | |||
*** '''Implement saving in that format for other types (including classdef).''' | |||
* Should we make and distribute nightly builds for Windows for the default branch? | * Should we make and distribute nightly builds for Windows for the default branch? | ||
** '''Traffic from Digital Ocean limited to 4 TB. (Higher monthly rate if exceeded?)''' | |||
** '''Probably no additional nightly build configurations for now.''' | |||
* Octave in MSYS2 (binary distributor for Windows MinGW) | |||
== Previous topics == | == Previous topics == |
Latest revision as of 09:34, 27 May 2024
- Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 @ 18:00 UTC Convert timezones here!
- Location: https://meet.jit.si/octave-dev
Today's topics[edit]
- Timing for next bugfix release
- potential blocker(?): bug #65605: Octave call to function figure(); results in segfault with Qt6 6.7.0
- jwe creates release candidate (see: Release candidate for Octave 9.2.0 available
- GSoC projects
- 8 applications
- Selection the day after the meeting
- OctConf 2024
- Roadmap and priorities for Octave 10
- Discuss a potential timeline for native string class support
- Blocker: Inability to save classdef objects to files. Potentially realizable in incremental steps:
- Implement a low-level HDF5 interface that is usable from .m code.
- Implement saving double arrays in Matlab-compatible -v7.3 format in .m files.
- Implement saving in that format for other types (including classdef).
- Blocker: Inability to save classdef objects to files. Potentially realizable in incremental steps:
- Should we make and distribute nightly builds for Windows for the default branch?
- Traffic from Digital Ocean limited to 4 TB. (Higher monthly rate if exceeded?)
- Probably no additional nightly build configurations for now.
- Octave in MSYS2 (binary distributor for Windows MinGW)
Previous topics[edit]
- Timing for next bugfix release (middle of April, approx. one month after the 9.1.0 release)
- bug #65476 (`mkoctfile -p LIBS` includes unnecessary libraries) Done
- Copyright dates for documentation, and possible MXE-Octave files out of date Done
- In the future, we'll likely aim for a .2.0 release around a month after the .1.0 release; a .3.0 around 3 month after the .1.0 release; and a .4.0 release about 6 months after the .1.0 release. If necessary, additional releases are possible in between or after these approximate dates, or some releases could be skipped.
- Andreas Bertsatos will open a thread about extracting demos from classdef files [1]
- OctConf 2024
- Agreed. Eastern North America likely. Rik will post a poll.
- Roadmap and priorities for Octave 10
- Which important features to focus on for Octave 10?
- JWE will try to make MExceptions real classdef objects (not overloadable, fully implemented in C++)
- JWE will try to start a thread on Discourse about potential new features for Octave 10.
- Discuss a potential timeline for native string class support
See also[edit]
- Next meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2024-05-28)
- Prev meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2024-03-26)