Online Developer Meeting (2020-11-10): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Update date and location) |
(→The future of Octave Packages: The package legacy in Savannah) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== The future of Octave Packages === | === The future of Octave Packages === | ||
: ''See also [https://octave.discourse.group/t/online-developer-meeting-2020-11-10-the-future-of-octave-packages/349 Discourse].'' | : ''See also [https://octave.discourse.group/t/online-developer-meeting-2020-11-10-the-future-of-octave-packages/349 Discourse].'' | ||
=== The package legacy in Savannah === | |||
When reporting an Octave (core) bug on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave you are "greeted" with '''1523 open bug reports''' of which [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave&func=browse&set=custom&msort=0&status_id=1&resolution_id=0&submitted_by=0&assigned_to=0&category_id=108&bug_group_id=0&severity=0&priority=0&summary=&details=&advsrch=0&msort=0&chunksz=100&spamscore=5&report_id=101&sumORdet=0&morder=bug_id%3C&sumOrdet=0&offset=0#results '''330 reports (22%)'''] belong to Octave Forge packages and '''240 (15%) are older than a year'''. | |||
* They are not likely to be closed or worked on and leave a maintenance burden and bad impression (user requests for unmaintained packages are ignored there) back to Octave (core). | |||
Ideas: | |||
* Ignore and collect requests to infinity? | |||
* Close bugs of inactive packages older than X years? (Drop the illusion, that someone ever will fix it.) | |||
* Octave Forge suggests to [https://octave.sourceforge.io/support-help.php use the Savannah Bug tracker] for bug reports. Drop this announcement? | |||
* Reopen the [https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/bugs/ old Octave Forge bug tracker]? | |||
== Ideas for next meeting == | == Ideas for next meeting == |
Revision as of 07:14, 10 November 2020
Todays topics
- Meet and greet 5 minutes before meeting (audio testing).
The future of Octave Packages
- See also Discourse.
The package legacy in Savannah
When reporting an Octave (core) bug on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave you are "greeted" with 1523 open bug reports of which 330 reports (22%) belong to Octave Forge packages and 240 (15%) are older than a year.
- They are not likely to be closed or worked on and leave a maintenance burden and bad impression (user requests for unmaintained packages are ignored there) back to Octave (core).
Ideas:
- Ignore and collect requests to infinity?
- Close bugs of inactive packages older than X years? (Drop the illusion, that someone ever will fix it.)
- Octave Forge suggests to use the Savannah Bug tracker for bug reports. Drop this announcement?
- Reopen the old Octave Forge bug tracker?
Ideas for next meeting
Topic suggestions
Octave 7
- Not only providing major releases that "fix Matlab incompatibilities".
- Great new features for a great new release.
- Code sprints.
See also
- Next meeting: TBA
- Last meeting: Online Developer Meeting (2020-10-27)