Editing Online Developer Meeting (2023-12-19)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Octave 9 remaining release activities | * Octave 9 remaining release activities | ||
** Blocking bugs | ** Blocking bugs | ||
*** Change in BLAS/LAPACK condition number for `inf (2,2)`. Should we disable tests for this feature to avoid confusion that something is wrong with Octave, while we work on a strategy for this? | *** Change in BLAS/LAPACK condition number for `inf (2,2)`. Should we disable tests for this feature to avoid confusion that something is wrong with Octave, while we work on a strategy for this? | ||
*** Windows Terminal problems | *** Windows Terminal problems | ||
**** Apparently the Developer option fix may not be readily visible for everyone? see https://octave.discourse.group/t/bug-octave-freezes/5097/9 | **** Apparently the Developer option fix may not be readily visible for everyone? see https://octave.discourse.group/t/bug-octave-freezes/5097/9 | ||
**** Do we have enough detail to create a useful report upstream at https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues ? | **** Do we have enough detail to create a useful report upstream at https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues ? | ||
** Translation files | ** Translation files | ||
** First names or abbreviated names in `contributors.in`? | ** First names or abbreviated names in `contributors.in`? | ||
** `-fsanitize` and other checks on code | ** `-fsanitize` and other checks on code | ||
*** Should leaks be analyzed in Discourse thread or a Savannah bug report? | *** Should leaks be analyzed in Discourse thread or a Savannah bug report? | ||
* Octave coding guidelines | * Octave coding guidelines | ||
** Need refresh as recommendations are out of date | ** Need refresh as recommendations are out of date | ||
*** Line length | *** Line length | ||
*** Break return type of function and put on separate line for class methods within class definition? | *** Break return type of function and put on separate line for class methods within class definition? | ||
*** `enum`, `struct` style not particularly clear or documented | *** `enum`, `struct` style not particularly clear or documented | ||
*** #ifdef indentation and styling | *** #ifdef indentation and styling | ||
* Public roadmap discussion. | * Public roadmap discussion. | ||
* Proposal [from cbm]: set aside last 15 or 20 minutes to hack on the bytecode interpreter. | * Proposal [from cbm]: set aside last 15 or 20 minutes to hack on the bytecode interpreter. | ||
** JWE asks questions, rest of us file issues or take notes. | ** JWE asks questions, rest of us file issues or take notes. | ||
Line 33: | Line 29: | ||
** If nothing else, a few of us will spend a few minutes trying the interpreter. | ** If nothing else, a few of us will spend a few minutes trying the interpreter. | ||
** Or could spend time <s>trying to break</s> testing the experimental terminal widget to start generating a buglist | ** Or could spend time <s>trying to break</s> testing the experimental terminal widget to start generating a buglist | ||
== Previous topics == | == Previous topics == |