User:Dspies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
111 bytes added ,  25 March 2014
Line 131: Line 131:
This fails with an OOM because it wasn't considered when writing max <br />
This fails with an OOM because it wasn't considered when writing max <br />
This sort of aggregate function (over the rows) can be done in O(min(h+nnz, nnz*log(w))) time, but one would have to implement the algorithm for each of the above-mentioned 7 functions.  By consolidating these into one templated function, it'll make it worth the effort to implement.</p>
This sort of aggregate function (over the rows) can be done in O(min(h+nnz, nnz*log(w))) time, but one would have to implement the algorithm for each of the above-mentioned 7 functions.  By consolidating these into one templated function, it'll make it worth the effort to implement.</p>
* The changes I made in https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8417 need to be added and need to be modified to accomodate diagonal matrices as well.  The fact that the original implementer of find neglected to handle diagonal matrices should be evidence enough that the ad-hoc approach doesn't work.
* There has to be a standard way to take an octave_value argument and call the proper template instantiation of a function based on its type. I started doing this with https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8417 , but diagonoal matrices still need to be added.  The fact that the original implementer of find neglected to handle diagonal matrices should be evidence enough that the ad-hoc approach doesn't work.
14

edits

Navigation menu