Editing User talk:Genuinelucifer

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 115: Line 115:
At this point, I switched to using the bash shell present with octave.
At this point, I switched to using the bash shell present with octave.


=== Use Octave's MSYS environment with help of msys2 toolchains ===
=== Use MSYS2 on top of Octave's MSYS environment ===
 
==== Build boost_python  ====
When using the bash prompt from 'octave-cli.exe' we could not use the libboost-python that we used octave Msys environment with help of MSYS2. First thing we had to do to build boost-python from source. The steps I used to build boost are: 


When using the bash prompt from 'octave-cli.exe' we could not use the libboost-python that we used with MSYS2, so we had to build boost from source using octave's msys tools.. The steps I used to build boost are: 
# Open octave-cli.exe
# Open octave-cli.exe
# cd e:/boost_1_61_0
# cd e:/boost_1_61_0
Line 127: Line 125:
# ./b2 install --with-python --prefix=/e/boost_build
# ./b2 install --with-python --prefix=/e/boost_build


 
But I was getting some linking error with octave. Tatsuro provided a 32 bit version of octave that he had built. After this, I had to use install 32 bit Python and rebuild boost.
At this moment building of boost-python with 64 bit tool chain fails at final link stage. So far octave-4.1.0+ 64 bit was used. From this point we shifted to using 32 bit octave. Using 32 bit octave 4.1.0+ for windows build of boost_python was successful.
 
==== Build Pytave  ====
 
# Open octave-cli.exe
# cd (Pytave build directoy)
# system bash
# export PATH=$PATH:/c/msys64/usr/bin
# ./configure (with CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS setting )
# make
 
There was an error in configure that PYTHON_EXTRA_LIBS was 'None' on windows and hence the configure failed. As per Mike's suggestion I set it to a valid gcc flag for the time being with ''export $PYTHON_EXTRA_LIBS=-g''
There was an error in configure that PYTHON_EXTRA_LIBS was 'None' on windows and hence the configure failed. As per Mike's suggestion I set it to a valid gcc flag for the time being with ''export $PYTHON_EXTRA_LIBS=-g''
After this too the build failed with undefined references to few symbols. Tatsuro suggested to build boost with ''link=static,shared''. He had successfully built boost with it but I could not build boost with this option on my PC.
After this too the build failed with undefined references to few symbols. Tatsuro suggested to build boost with ''link=static,shared''. He had successfully built boost with it but I could not build boost with this option on my PC.


To sum up, Tatsuro has built 32 bit version of octave and used it to build libboost-python with the option ''link=static,shared'' and has successfully got the configure step done. But in the ''make'' step he is getting some undefined symbol errors for ''__imp__'' symbols.
To sum up, Tatsuro has built 32 bit version of octave and used it to build libboost-python with the option ''link=static,shared'' and has successfully got the configure step done. But in the ''make'' step he is getting some undefined symbol errors for ''__imp__'' symbols.
(This information is obtained from trials of out-of-box of linking object files. )


=== Summary ===
=== Summary ===
Line 198: Line 184:
=== Conclusion ===
=== Conclusion ===


With some efforts, build Pytave on windows has not been completed yet.
To quote Tatsuro ''A lot of _imp__ symbols errors are detected because no _imp__(symbol)s exist in object files. While object files libboost_python for threading-multi have _imp__(symbol)s in their object files. Boost does not show full compiling states. Therefore I do not know what libboost is to do.''
Here list of unsolved issue including boost-python are listed
 
# libboost_python cannot be build be build on 64 bit environments
# path separator handling issue in libtool (windows standard path separator \ (back slash) is ignored.
# make fails at building shared library
 
For 3, to quote Tatsuro ''A lot of _imp__ symbols errors are detected because no _imp__(symbol)s exist in object files. While object files libboost_python for threading-multi have _imp__(symbol)s in their object files. Boost does not show full compiling states. Therefore I do not know what libboost is to do.''


I too have googled extensively but haven't gotten to any solution for this problem.
I too have googled extensively but haven't gotten to any solution for this problem.
Please note that all contributions to Octave may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Octave:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: